Published on Jul 12, 2019
198
107
61
76
34
40
52
52
45
18
Gee, That Sounds Familiar
Berkeley Administration is Teaching Illegal Aliens How to Fight Back Against ICE
By Jose Nino
Campus Reform reports that the University of California, Berkeley has a system in place to protect students and faculty who are illegal immigrants.
Berkeleyâs Undocumented Student Program (USP) helps provide illegal immigrants on campus with educational and legal assistance. The Los Angeles Times details that the UC system vowed to not cooperate with immigration enforcement officials and turn over private records without first receiving court orders.
The USP provides various resources, which includes a webpage, titled  âWhat to do if ICE comes to your door,â a five-step plan that teaches illegal immigrants how to act when confronting an ICE agent.
The first four parts instruct the reader âDO NOT OPEN DOORS,â âREMAIN SILENT,â âDO NOT SIGN,â and âREPORT THE RAID!â and the last step says âFIGHT BACK!â
The âFIGHT BACK!â section has a fist image and says âget a trustworthy attorney & explore all options to fight your case. If detained, you may be able to get bail â donât give up hope!â
The USP does not stop with its five-step plan.
The USP also has a ârapid response hotlineâ that illegal students and faculty can use when dealing with ICE.
Simply by dialing the Alameda County Immigration Legal and Education Partnership-sponsored hotline, Berkley faculty and the student body can warn illegal immigrants in advance about ICE activity on campus.
Carol Christ, the UC Berkeley Chancellor, put the schoolâs USP in the spotlight through a statement on June 26. The statement solidified the universityâs mission to protect illegal immigrants.
Christ said, âEvery member of the UC Berkeley community is a valuable contributor to the university, regardless of immigration status.â
The UC Berkeley Chancellor added, âWe remain steadfast in welcoming, supporting, and building community with our undocumented students and staff.â
She then concluded by warning illegal immigrants on campus about the prospects of ICE going on university grounds to enforce immigration laws.
She warned, âAccording to media reports, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) may conduct enforcement activities in the coming weeks. These media reports suggest that ICE is preparing to detain individuals who have missed a court date or have deportation orders.â
This is another case of a subversive leftist institution trying to facilitate the Leftâs mass migration agenda.
After all, demographic trends do point to third world migrants being a voting bloc for leftist causes, so it makes sense for leftist institutions to put policies that encourage these kinds of migration patterns.
Europe is already showing what the consequences of mass migration look like, and America First patriots are taking note.
For that reason, BLP reports that immigration is the #1 issue going into the 2020 elections.
WATCH: Matt Gaetz Exposes Democratic Party Leadership for Laughing at Border Crisis
The freshman Congressman repeatedly played a clip showing the hypocrisy of the Democrats.
By Shane Trejo
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) took Congressional Democrats to task over their lies regarding the national emergency at the U.S. southern border, which they have allowed to worsen in order to blame the crisis on President Donald Trump.
Gaetz played a clip on a loop of House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) laughing off the notion of a humanitarian crisis at the border while being asked about it in an interview from January before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-PA) issued a point of order suggesting Gaetz repeating the âout of contextâ clip was inappropriate. She was informed by the parliamentarian that he was not out of order.
âI just think thatâs quite something when youâre fed back your own words from your own leadership from earlier this year, you think thatâs out of context and inappropriate and not allowed,â Gaetz said referring to the clip.
âAgain, we didnât raise the issue. It was the gentlelady from Texas that said these allegations from Republicans that we were in denial, theyâre offensive, weâve always known of the crisis, and the Democratic whip laughed,â Gaetz continued.
Clyburn was not the only Congressional Democratic leader who denied the reality of the crisis at the U.S. southern border. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) did so as well.
âMost presidents have used Oval Office addresses for noble purposes,â Schumer said in January. âThis president just used the backdrop of the Oval Office to manufacture a crisis, stoke fear, and divert attention from the turmoil in his administration.â
Sen. Elizabeth âPocahontasâ Warren (D-MA) denied the order crisis as well while it was unfolding, only to virtue-signal and blame Trump when it became politically convenient for her to do so.
So Elizabeth Warren says she went to the border in June 2018 and saw a humanitarian crisis, but then in March 2019… twitter.com/i/web/status/1⌗
(@neontaster) June 26, 2019
Gaetz made note that the Trump administration has been sounding the alarm bells the entire time.
âYou know who doesnât think itâs funny? The Trump administration, because [Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security] Secretary [Kevin] McAleenan has been ringing the warning bell for months about the crisis. He begged you all to take action more quickly,â Gaetz said.
âIt should be very clear from these numbers that we âre facing alarming trends and a rising volume of people illegally crossing our southwest border, or arriving at our ports of entry without documents,â McAleenan said back in March. âThe system is well beyond capacity and remains at the breaking point.â
Democrats have ignored the warnings from the Trump administration, instead choosing to play politics with the issue of border security with U.S. communities and migrant children suffering mightily as a result.
âOne of the reasons why so many young people, so many vulnerable people are in tragic conditions is because we didnât act when the administration wanted us to provide funding that was absolutely necessary to care for people,â Gaetz explained.
âIt wasnât the Republicans that were in denial. It was all of you, and it was in your own words from your own leadership. Be offended with the Democratic whip, not the House Republicans,â Gaetz concluded.
The smack down can be seen in its full context here:
AOC Declares WAR! Says Pelosi Targeting Women Of Color
By Jeff Dunetz
After being disciplined by Speaker Pelosi for fighting internal Democratic Party battles via Twitter, in front of the public, freshman member of Congress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) complained that Pelosi was specifically targeting women of color for her criticism.
When the House voted on the emergency border funding bill, AOC and three other freshmen members of Congress (Ilhan Omar D-MN, Rashida Tlaib D-MI, and Ayanna Pressley D-MA) very publicly voted no. In an interview with the NY Times over the weekend, Pelosi tried to reign in the four junior members of her caucus with, âAll these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world, but they didnât have any following. Theyâre four people, and thatâs how many votes they got.ââ
She doubled down during a meeting of the entire House Democratic caucus on Wednesday. Without naming the offenders, Pelosi was reported as saying, âSo, again, you got a complaint? You come and talk to me about it. But do not tweet about our members and expect us to think that that is just OK.â
After the caucus meeting, Pelosi on Wednesday Ocasio-Cortez spoke to the Washington Post expressing her belief that the Speakerâs admonishment wasnât about protecting the caucus moderates:
âWhen these comments first started, I kind of thought that she was keeping the progressive flank at more of an armâs distance in order to protect more moderate members, which I understood,
âBut the persistent singling out .â.â. it got to a point where it was just outright disrespectful .â.â. the explicit singling out of newly elected women of color.â
Now thatâs ironic. Pelosi doesnât seem to be a racist, but she loves using the race card against Republicans. For example, commenting on the issue a census citizenship question on Monday Pelosi made a ridiculous charge, âThis is about keeping â you know ⌠his hat â Make America White Again. They want to make sure that people, certain people, are counted. Itâs really disgraceful, and itâs not what our founders had in mind.â
Itâs nice to see Pelosi get hit with the race card since she uses it indiscriminately herself. The real good news is that this latest exchange took the feud in the Democratic Party and made it personal. The more the Democrats fight, and the nastier it gets, the better the GOP will do in 2020. So besides being entertaining, in the end, this Democratic Party feud will be good for America.
Kids in cages: House Dems scrub tweet with photo of Obama-era detention center used to attack Trump
House Democrats have erased a tweet promoting a hearing on the effects of President Trumpâs border policies on children after finding out they used a photo depicting a migrant detention center under President Obamaâs watch.
The tweet was posted in anticipation of a hearing scheduled for Wednesday afternoon, dubbed âKids in Cages: Inhumane Treatment at the Borderâ, and included a dramatic photo backdrop displaying the dismal conditions at US migrant detention facilities â but it was soon deleted after conservative critics pointed out the origins of the image.
âLast week, members of our committee visited a detention center at the southern border and discovered grotesque treatment of children,â reads the now-deleted tweet, posted on Tuesday. âThis week, we are examining the inhumane treatment of the children in these detention centers.â
The congressional Democrats then had another go at it, but their alternative photo choice, much to the lawmakersâ immediate embarrassment, was also taken while President Obama was still in office. The second tweet was deleted in record time and replaced with nothing, as apparently the many thousands of up-to-date photos of the detention centers fail to convey the same sense of horror as the Obama-era images. Or perhaps a third photo was simply too much effort.
Opponents of the Trump administration have previously used the same photo to attack the presidentâs border policies, to such an extent that the Associated Press was forced to publish a story clarifying that the image in question was captured in 2014, smack in the middle of Obamaâs second term. The AP, not exactly a pro-Trump media arm, kindly requested critics to stop attributing the images to Donald Trump.
While the Oversight Committeeâs Wednesday hearing featured plenty of cogent criticisms of President Trumpâs approach to the border, it seems that for many Democrats, âinhumaneâ policies arenât so objectionable as long as the right person is sitting in the chair.
Bad unless Obama does it? Biden slams Trump for immigration policies he once supported
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
SJW ROSIE OâDONNELL CLAIMS TRUMP HAS INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP WITH IVANKA
âI think heâs been doing bad things with her for a very long time,â OâDonnell says
By Adan Salazar
Rosie OâDonnell on Wednesday outrageously claimed President Trump has sexually abused his daughter Ivanka.
In a Sirius XM discussion about the recent G20 Summit, OâDonnell ripped the Trump family with false accusations of incest before essentially calling Ivanka a dumb blonde.
âThere are a lot of republicans, I think even Donald Trump may be among them, who think or hope the first woman president will be Ivanka Trump,â says SiriusXM Progress host Michaelangelo Signorile.
âOh dear lord,â OâDonnell grunts in response.
âYou saw her just now at the G20 with him. He brought her to every meeting. Talk a little bit about I Ivanka Trump and what Trump is doing with her.â
âI donât know what heâs doing with her,â OâDonnell bleats.
âI mean politically,â Signorile clarifies.
âI think heâs been doing bad things with her for a very long time,â OâDonnell continues.
âThereâs a prevalent incest feel amongst Donald Trump and his children, at least his daughter. Very creepyâŚI think sheâs, you know, a talentless, non-intelligent, non-powerful woman. And I think sheâsâitâs laughable to think of her in any kind of public service role.â
OâDonnell is likely still fuming over Trumpâs public humiliations of her, of which there have been plenty; from saying heâd oust her âfat, ugly faceâ right out of her former co-hosting gig on The View:
to the hilarious swipe he made at her during the first Republican presidential debate in 2015.
Cops Push Back In BIG Way After Left Wing AG Threatens Them If They Cooperate With ICE
New Jersey Cops Push Back BIG Time Against Left-Wing AG Who Threatened Them If They Assist ICE Agents
By Jon Dougherty
Police officers and sheriffs are pushing back hard against the attorney general of New Jersey after the threatened to take legal action against anyone found to be assisting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in apprehending illegal aliens in the state.
As reported by Law Enforcement Today, AG Gurbir Grewal singled out two sheriffâs offices this week for âfailing to inform the stateâs attorney general that they are helping federal immigration authorities capture and deport undocumented migrants.â
The site noted:
In the aggressive letters that Grewalâs office sent to the elected sheriffs in Monmouth and Cape May this week, officials claim the county sheriffs went directly against a directive that Grewal had issued which would aim to limit cooperation between New Jersey cops and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Itâs called Law Enforcement Directive 2018-6, more often referred to as the âImmigrant Trust Directiveâ, and it bars local law enforcement agencies from voluntarily working with federal immigration officials.
Grewalâs office now says that working with federal officials in this capacity would âessentially deputize our stateâs police officers to act like ICE agents.â Grewal says that the measure was supposed to build trust between the immigrant communities and law enforcement for reporting and helping with criminal investigations. He says cooperation with ICE can only continue if he decides it serves âa valid law enforcement purpose.â
Greater Lakewood news added that the AG accused the sheriffâs departments of working too closely with ICE. Last year, Sussex Sheriff Mike Strada âaccused the AG of making New Jersey a sanctuary state,â the paper reported.
WELCOME TO NEW JERSEY: NJ AG accuses Sheriffs of working too closely with ICE https://t.co/j9fcGiSgM7 via @GreaterLakewood
â GreaterLakewood.com (@GreaterLakewood)Â July 9, 2019
The local news site also published images of the letters Grewelâs office sent to the departments.
Law Enforcement Today noted further that police agencies have sent letters to U.S. Attorney General William Barr protesting Grewelâs policy. Also, New Jersey citizens have petitioned to have the policy put to a statewide vote, but so far to no avail.
For his part, Grewel claims to have absolute authority over the actions of local police jurisdictions in the state by issuing his directive.
âOfficials and residents may not instruct their law enforcement officers to ignore a law enforcement directive,â Grewal said following complaints about the measure.
More:
Grewalâs directive went into effect in March of 2019. NJ.com reported that at the time, sheriffâs offices in three New Jersey counties â Cape May, Monmouth and Salem â still had existing agreements with ICE under a program dubbed â287g,â which allows state and local law enforcement to âact as a force multiplierâ for ICE. Several counties had earlier done away with the agreements, which in New Jersey mainly applied to officers in county jails.
21 states take part in the 287g program. Officials say it âallows ICE to actively engage criminal alien offenders while incarcerated in a secure and controlled environment.â
Just last week, Grewel bragged on Twitter about New Jersey working with âfederalâ and other partners to curb criminal activity.
Everyone deserves to live in a community free from fear & violence. We want New Jerseyans to know that we’re doing everything we can by working w/ our federal & local partners to make that promise a reality. Reducing violent crime is a top priority & we wonât waver in our efforts
â AG Gurbir Grewal (@NewJerseyOAG)Â July 3, 2019
That sounds rather hypocritical.
Law Enforcement Today added:
Hold on.Â
Letâs get this straight. Law enforcement officers in New Jersey are doing their jobs by working with federal ICE agents to arrest and deport people who are actively breaking the law, and the attorney general, who is supposed to work alongside the criminal justice system to uphold the ConstitutionâŚis threatening them?
When did we decide which laws are important and which arenât? How is living in the country illegally justified because a leader in your state suddenly decided to go against federal law enforcement agencies and declare the community one of sanctuary?
This is becoming far too popular of a trend.
This article originally appeared at The National Sentinel and was republished with permission.
Join us at SPREELY if you want REAL NEWS without the leftist censorship!
Dean James at Right Wing Tribune
God Bless.
Dems Call For Silencing, Confronting, Prosecuting Opponents Then Facebook Allows Deaththreats
Published on Jul 10, 2019
Collection of clips of Dems calling for the confronting, silencing, prosecuting, political opponents which led activists inside facebook to allow death threats against people they deem dangerous which include Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson.
Ilhan Omar brands Tucker Carlson a âracist foolâ in scathing tweet
Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar called Fox News host Tucker Carlson a âracist foolâ for saying she is âliving proofâ that US immigration policy is a danger to the country.
Omarâs scathing tweet came in response to Tuesdayâs edition of âTucker Carlson Tonight,â in which the eponymous host said the congresswoman is âliving proof that the way we practice immigration has become dangerous to this country.âÂ
âSome of the very people we try hardest to help have come to hate us passionately,â ranted Carslon. âSheâs a living fire alarm, a warning to the rest of us that we better change our immigration system immediately, or else,â he concluded.
Carslon has repeatedly bashed Omar for being âungratefulâ for her criticism of the US, after she came to the country as a child refugee from Somalia in 1992.
Omar, one of the first two Muslim women to be elected to Congress, has also angered President Donald Trump, who accused her of being âout of controlâ after her comments about the stigma towards American Muslims since 9/11.
Judge, jury & executioner: Facebook policy permits death threats against âdangerous individualsâ
Facebook has issued an ominous new policy permitting death threats and calls for violence â so long as theyâre directed against âdangerousâ individuals or organizations, or someone accused (but not convicted) of a crime.
Facebook has updated its âcommunity standardsâ to carve out a few exceptions to its âno death threatsâ policy. Calls for âhigh-severity violenceâ are now permitted, as long as theyâre directed at individuals âcovered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policyâ or individuals âdescribed as having carried out violent crimes or sexual offensesâ by media reports. After all, are people banned from Facebook really people at all?
âNo future for dissidentsâ on social media: Paul Joseph Watson reflects on Facebook ban
The change was spotted on Tuesday by commentator Paul Joseph Watson, who along with his former Infowars boss Alex Jones was one of a handful of mostly-conservative personalities banned from Facebook in May under its âDangerous Individualsâ policy. Back then, even mentioning one of the banned names could get a user banned â unless the mention was derogatory.
Facebook has apparently taken that âhate the hatersâ tactic and run with it. While the âDangerous Individualsâ policy supposedly only covers âterrorist activity, organized hate, mass or serial murder, human trafficking, and organized violence or criminal activity,â none of the commentators banned – including Watson, Jones, conservative political performance artist Milo Yiannopoulos, and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan â were involved in any of those activities. But, Watson discovered, a person wearing an Infowars t-shirt is enough to get a photo removed from Instagram, and photos that include banned individuals – even if their faces are blurred out – have been deleted as well.
Equally ominous is Facebookâs decision to dispense with the concept of âinnocent until proven guiltyâ that forms the core of the US legal system (Facebook is based in Menlo Park, California, and at least theoretically subject to US laws). Individuals need only be accused in the media of violent crimes and sexual offenses to become fair game for death threats â not convicted in court. For a company that claims to take the threat of âfake newsâ very seriously, Facebook is surprisingly cavalier about the potential for media misinformation to lead to violence.
But then, Facebook never even tried to prove Watson, Jones or any of the other banned users were âDangerous Individuals,â either â its policy has always been that banned users are guilty until proven innocent, as any user whoâs ever been forced to jump through its tech support hoops to restore a banned account can attest.
âThe largest social media company in the world with over 2 billion users literally says itâs fine to incite violence against me, despite this being illegal,â Watson wrote at Summit.news, pointing out that sending death threats or threats of violence is, in fact, a crime under UK law (as it is under US law and the laws of most developed countries with substantial Facebook-using populations).
Facebook even tracks off-platform behavior to determine whether users should be blacklisted as âhate agents,â according to internal documents seen by Breitbart, meaning merely showing up at the same event as a âdangerous individualâ can potentially earn a user the designation. The siteâs list of âhate agentsâ is reportedly quite exhaustive and includes British politicians Carl Benjamin and Anne Marie Waters as well as conservative commentators like Yiannopoulos and Candace Owens. Because all this classification goes on in secret, users have no chance to appeal their un-personing, and may never even know they are being judged, until they start receiving Facebook-approved death threats of their own.
Tom's Blog 
292