Published on Apr 9, 2019


Rose appeared on WNETâs MetroFocus with interviewer Rafael Pi Roman, who asked why he opposed the Green New Deal. Rose, a decorated veteran from the war in Afghanistan who has termed climate change a national security threat, started with his own prescription: âLetâs look at climate change in and of itself. We need urgent and bold action. I think that comes in the form of substantive cap-and-trade program; we also have to come to terms with the fact that this is a global problem, requires a global solution. We have got to get back into the Paris Agreements. Beyond that though, we need substantive and incredible technological advancement. We need Apollo projects of our generation for battery technology, for other forms of carbon-free energy production, for smart-grid systems.â
Rose then attacked the Green New Deal, saying:
All of these things have to happen; they have to happen quickly; this is not the time for Milquetoast incrementalism; it just isnât. But with that being said, though, nothing about what I just said would provide a justification for a massive socialist economic policy platform, just not needed. We can have a separate discussion, a separate debate about whether this is the time and whether America needs those types of economic policy prescriptions, job guarantees, housing guarantees, things that on its (sic) face sound good but I just do not believe are possible. Theyâre not economically feasible. Thereâs no need to lie to voters right now. We donât [need] the Democratic version of âRepeal and Replace.â We donât need that.
In the same interview, Rose gave a blunt answer when Pi Roman stated that Ocasio-Cortez had been rumored to have said she was keeping a list of centrist House Democrats who did not follow the hard leftist line she espoused; Pi Roman pointed out that Rose was one of 20 or so Democrats who had joined Republicans in voting to allow ICE to be notified if an illegal immigrant tried to purchase a firearm.
Pi Roman said, âThe progressives didnât like it, and congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez vowed to keep a list of Democrats who stray from the fold.â
Rose responded: âSheâs gonna keep a list?
Pi Roman: Yeah. Thatâs what she said. How do you respond?
Rose answered, âThis is very simple, because Iâm not one to deal in subtleties.
Pi Roman: Iâve heard. I have noticed.
Rose continued, âI think itâs best not to be passive-aggressive. If she wants to primary me; if the Justice Democrats want to primary me, Iâll lay out the red carpet. We can settle this at the polls.â
Pi Roman: The Justice Democrats are kind of a caucus of progressives.
Rose: This is very, very, very simple.
Videos below:


MARCH 28, 2019
Pelosiâs Climate Action Now Act, announced Wednesday to media fanfare, aims to prevent President Donald Trump from removing the U.S. from the 2016 accord. The deal, which compels the country to cut greenhouse gas emissions 26 to 28 percent by 2025, is a non-binding agreement made after former President Barack Obama was unable to get the required votes in Congress to make it a treaty.
If the California Democrat wants to legally force Trump to abide by the deal, then she needs to go through the complicated legal process to make the deal a treaty rather than a non-binding deal, Competitive Enterprise Institute senior fellow Chris Horner told The Daily Caller News Foundation Thursday.
âThe bill asserts that Paris is presently binding on the U.S., would bind us to its terms if we remain signatories, and seeks to ensure that Pres. Trump cannot consummate his promise to withdraw by his announced pathway before they have a chance to retake the White House and lock us in,â he said via email.
The globalists have chosen China as the country that will lead the way into humanityâs future. Alex Jones breaks down how a one-sided deal made 50 years ago puts China in the driverâs seat.
Horner added: âOr, if you want legislative involvement suddenly, itâs a treaty, as it obviously is, and transmit it to the Senate for a ratification vote. If Speaker Pelosi wants to formalize matters, letâs do it the way the rest of the world did particularly our European models â by submitting it to our elected representatives for a vote, as a treaty, pursuant to our governing constitution.â
Pelosiâs bill is a watered-down version of New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezâs Green New Deal, which called for a near complete shift away from fossil fuels and toward green energy. The GND was torpedoed in the Senate Tuesday after Republicans voted against the resolution while Democrats voted present.
European officials heavily criticized Trump for deciding to leave the Paris accord shortly after taking office. Democratic governors and wealthy environmental groups created the Global Climate Action Summit in September 2018, bringing together activists to promote the goals of the Paris climate accord.
The new bill could hit some speed bumps, especially if it attempts to bind Trump to the dying deal. Obama joined the Paris accord after years of working behind the scenes to craft what would become a non-binding deal, but he did so without submitting it to the Senate. His signature achievement was ultimately dashed after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lost to Trump.
Tethering the president and the country to Paris could affect the other participants in the deal.

China, one of the more than 200 other countries that signed on to the deal, is the worldâs largest greenhouse gas emitter and made no commitment to cut greenhouse emissions. Instead, the communist nation said it would reach peak emissions and the amount it emits per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030. China is also not legally obligated to comply with the accord.
China has taken steps in recent years to close down coal mines and shut down coal-fired power plants, but those measures are largely designed to solve the countryâs poor air quality. Beijing also recently became the first Chinese city to replace all its coal power with natural gas.
Pelosiâs office has not yet responded to TheDCNFâs request for comment about whether the California Democrat is seeking to make the accord a treaty.
By Chris White

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described the Climate Action Now Act as one of many steps toward Democratic efforts to confront global warming. In particular, the bill aims to preventPresident Donald Trump from removing the United States from the non-binding Paris Climate accord. (RELATED: McConnell And Senate Republicans Vote To Kill Green New Deal)
The bill is a watered-down version of New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezâs Green New Deal, which called for shifting completely away from fossil fuels and toward green energy. The GND was torpedoed in the Senate on Tuesday after Republicans voted en masse against the resolution while Democrats voted present.
Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat, was not present Wednesday during the roll out of the Climate Action Act.

The GND was introduced in February and called for â10-year national mobilizationsâ toward a series of goals aimed at fighting global warming. A fact sheet posted online during the introduction claimed the plan would âmobilize every aspect of American society on a scale not seen since World War 2.â It also became an object of ridicule as a draft suggested the end of cows and drastically curbing airplane travel.
House Democrats along with most of the Democratic Partyâs quickly expanding 2020 presidential field have voiced support for the measure. Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Cory Booker of New Jersey, who both announced their bids for the 2020 nomination, for instance, signed on as Senate co-sponsors of the proposal.
Pelosiâs office has not yet responded to The Daily Caller News Foundationâs request for comment about why Ocasio-Cortez was absent.
By Shane Trejo

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) announced last week that they are blacklisting any vendors from work in the party unless they agree to a loyalty oath of sorts indicating that they will not challenge incumbent Democrats.
The form reads as follows: âI understand the above statement that the DCCC will not conduct business with, nor recommend to any of its targeted campaigns, any consultant that works with an opponent of a sitting Member of the House Democratic Caucus.â
The Intercept published an op/ed written by a far-left activist detailing how the restrictive move from the party elite is creating fissures within the grassroots heading into 2020:
âLike many women in their 20s across America, I feel inexplicably hopeful and manifestly seen when I watch Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez take on the stale and insular political dynamics of WashingtonâŚ
Ocasio-Cortezâs unapologetic energy in Washington cannot be separated from her decision to run against Joe Crowley in Queens, New York. Every action Ocasio-Cortez takes carries the same fearlessness that prompted her not to wait her turnâŚ
Yet instead of embracing Ocasio-Cortez and the fresh path she has opened, the DCCC and other national âDemocraticâ organizations are wrapping their arms more tightly around the heavily white, male incumbent Democrats in Washington.â
Between this and the disenfranchisement of Bernie Sanders supporters, the grassroots left is beginning to get the picture that the Democratic elite is not on their side. In fact, the Democratic brass treats their constituents in a similar manner that Republican leadership is known to treat theirs.
The New York Times received word in 2014, near the peak of the tea party phenomenon, that âtop congressional Republicans and their alliesâ were working to âdeny [Tea Party-backed candidates] any Senate primary victories, cut into their fund-raising and diminish them as a future force in Republican politics.â
âI think we are going to crush them everywhere,â Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)Â said at the time, referring to tea party upstart primary challengers. âI donât think they are going to have a single nominee anywhere in the country.â
McConnell may have been arrogant but was not wrong in making his boast. With the one lone exception of libertarian economist Dave Brat upending Rep. Eric Cantor in Virginia, every single tea party challenger was put down in 2014. State senator Chris McDaniel came the closest to defeating incumbent Thad Cochran, but lost in a run-off election following extreme corruption. The movement would never quite recover.
âI know this: Politics doesnât like losers. If you donât have anything to point to, it is kind of hard to keep it going,â McConnell said of his opposition, kicking dirt into their face while they were down.
The Democratic Party elite hopes to replicate the success that the Republican Party bosses had during the Obama presidency in derailing their ascendant grassroots rebellion, but the far left is very much aware of what is happening and does not plan to go down lightly.


With the civil war ongoing for the soul of the Democratic Party, that does not bode well for their chances in 2020. The extremists in their midst will likely cause great division heading into the presidential election, and that has to be music to President Donald Trumpâs ears.

By Tyler Durden
So embarrassing that when Senate majority leader McConnell tried to force the Democratic partyâs presidential contenders into an embarrassing vote over the berserk, MMT-inducing climate-change proposal (which Republicans are confident that even sober liberal will oppose), not a single Democrat voted for it. Instead, in the vote which was blocked late on Tuesday with a vote of 0-57, 43 Democrats voted merely “present”, including the Senateâs half-dozen presidential candidates, to sidestep the GOP maneuver and, as Bloomberg put it, “buy time to build their campaign positions.”
The vote was the first of many attempts by Republicans to force (socialist, MMT) supporters of the Green New Deal to come into the spotlight and suffer the public scrutiny. The proposal – mostly a collection of goals for mitigating climate change rather than a fully formed plan of action – which according to some would cost north of $100 trillion and would require the launch of helicopter money, also known as “MMT”, has been a favorite target for criticism by McConnell and Republicans ever since freshman Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts rolled it out in February.
âI could not be more glad that the American people will have the opportunity to learn precisely where each one of their senators stand on this radical, top-down, socialist makeover of the entire U.S. economy,â McConnell said before the vote.
Alas, that opportunity was denied because instead of voicing their support for the most ludicrous proposal in socialist history, 43 Democrats decided to take the easy way out.
Even the six Democratic presidential contenders, including Cory Booker of New Jersey, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, all voted present.
At this point, the candidates for the Democratic nomination generally havenât spelled out specific proposals. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey has called the Green New Deal âbold,â and Senator Kamala Harris of California has said itâs âan investmentâ worth the cost. Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota described it somewhat less enthusiastically, as an âaspirationâ to act on climate change.
Fresh off what has been dubbed the best day in Trump’s presidency, on Tuesday Trump, no longer the subject of Russia collusion conspiracy theories, met with Senate Republicans at the Capitol, and according to Lindsey Graham the president told them regarding the Green New Deal, âmake sure you donât kill it too much because I want to run against itâ in 2020.
Well, so far so good. In an attempt to save face with progressives, Adam Green, a co-founder of the grassroots Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said McConnell was trying to force some ânoâ votes at a time when Democrats are still reviewing the plan. Voting âpresentâ shows that Democrats arenât going to hamper things with an early dissent, he said.
While the “present” votes were to be expected, what came as a surprise is that three Democrats voted with Republicans against the resolution including Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Doug Jones of Alabama, who faces a tough re-election campaign next year in a deep-red state. Independent Angus King of Maine, a member of the Democratic caucus, also voted against the measure.
The challenge for Democrats looking ahead to next yearâs campaigns is to avoid having their support for a still-evolving climate proposal tarred by Republican efforts to portray it as an extremist agenda that would do away with hamburgers and airplane travel.
âItâs one thing to be on the campaign trail and say here is what I believe in and fill in the details,â said Democratic strategist Rodell Mollineau, who was a top aide to former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid. âItâs another thing to go on record and let other people fill in the details for you.â
As Bloomberg notes, “the Green New Deal has more than 100 congressional Democrats as co-sponsors, including the six senators running for president. While Democrats are united on the need for significant action to stem climate change, they donât agree on specific proposals.” As a result, McConnell introduced his own version, drawing on the language of the Democratic measure.
Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer tried to shield Democrats from having to expose splits between moderates and progressives on the issue. He dismissed the vote as âgotcha politicsâ intended by Republicans to distract from the fact that they donât have their own plan to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
âRepublicans want to force this political stunt to distract from the fact that they neither have a plan nor a sense of urgency to deal with the threat of climate change,â he said.
Following tonight’s Senate vote, Democrats plan to introduce a resolution in the House this week that calls for the U.S. to remain part of the Paris Climate Accord and requires the Trump administration to create a plan to meet its emission reduction goal, according to a senior Democratic aide. As a reminder, in 2017 Trump announced that he intends to pull out of the Paris agreement, under which the U.S. pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent from 2005 levels by 2025.
While Senate Democrats werenât under any real pressure from outside progressive groups to vote for the Green New Deal at this point, they will be in due course.
Meanwhile, capitalizing on the ultra-liberal faction within the Democratic Party, the GOPâs message focuses on the botched February rollout of the proposal, which included the release of documents from Ocasio-Cortezâs office promising economic security even for those âunwilling to work,â and suggesting the eventual elimination of air travel and âfarting cows.â
