Published on May 30, 2019


Published on May 29, 2019


By Joshua Caplan

Mueller will speak at the Justice Department at 11 a.m. EST and will not take any questions.
It was not clear what he intended to say, but the statement comes amid demands for Mueller to testify on Capitol Hill about his findings and tension with Attorney General William Barr over the handling of his report.
Muellerâs report into Russia meddling in the 2016 election did not find that Russia and the Trump campaign coordinated to sway the presidential election. It did not reach a conclusion on whether the president had obstructed justice. Barr has said he was surprised that Mueller did not reach a conclusion, and decided with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that the evidence did not support an obstruction of justice allegation.
The attorney general is currently in Alaska for work.
According to CNBCâs Eamon Javers, the White House was told Tuesday evening that Mueller was planning on issuing a statement Wednesday.

The development comes after negotiations about Muellerâs tentative testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on May 15th fell through.
The House panelâs chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) said earlier this month that talks will continue with Mueller and the Justice Department about the testimony. The New York Democrat wouldnât characterize those talks, though he said he expects Mueller to eventually appear, and if he wonât agree the committee will attempt to compel him.
âIf necessary weâll subpoena him and heâll come,â Nadler said.
The negotiations over Muellerâs appearance come as Democrats are clashing with the Justice Department over access to Muellerâs full report on the Trump-Russia investigation. The Judiciary panel on recently voted to hold Barr in contempt of Congress after he defied the committeeâs subpoena for an unredacted version of the report.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.Â


By Sara Carter
It is evident that former senior Obama administration officials and opponents of President Trump know that and fear it. It began last night with the ânon-storyâ that Special Counsel Robert Mueller prosecutors werenât happy with Barrâs four page letter explaining their report on the Russia investigation.
âWe did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision,â Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
âWe donât conduct criminal investigations just to collect information and put it out to the public. We do so to make a decision,â Barr told lawmakers. He suggested that Mueller should have come to a decision but avoided the criticism of Democrats by passing the ball to him with regard to obstruction.
It was also apparent in the opinion editorial placed in the New York Times by disgraced and fired former Director of the FBI James Comey. Comey challenged Barrâs use of the word âspying.â Thatâs exactly what Comeyâs office did to the Trump campaign even if the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court sanctioned the bureauâs probe into former Trump campaign volunteers, like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
âHow could Mr. Barr, a bright and accomplished lawyer, start channeling the president in using words like âno collusionâ and F.B.I. âspyingâ? And downplaying acts of obstruction of justice as products of the presidentâs being âfrustrated and angry,â something he would never say to justify the thousands of crimes prosecuted every day that are the product of frustration and anger,â wrote Comey.
Channeling the president? What is Comey talking about. Mueller found no evidence of conspiracy with Russia and Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, found no grounds for obstruction.
The use of the word âspyingâ is a common phrase used for exactly what it is meant. Just look it up in Websterâs Dictionary.
However, Comey is well aware that the public fight is all he has left. He is walking a legal tight rope and he knows it.
If there is anyone who was channeling anybody, it was Comey. He channeled the words of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch when he called the investigation into Hillary Clintonâs use of a private sever to send classified government emails âa matterâ and not an investigation.
He channeled Obama when he uttered the same phrases that Clinton was not âintentionallyâ putting American lives in jeopardy when she sent classified information on a server, our government believes was penetrated by multiple foreign state actors.
Remember what Obama said in April 2016: âHillary Clinton was an outstanding secretary of state. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.â
Comey said months later in July 2016, when he exonerated Clinton: âWe did not find evidence sufficient to establish that she knew she was sending classified information beyond a reasonable doubt to meet the intent standard.â It wasnât about meeting the standard, under the law itâs about gross negligence.
Barr has taken charge. Comey and his crew of FBI cohorts, along with other senior Obama administration officials, have a lot to worry about.
The DOJ is now investigating the origins of the FBIâs investigation and that frankly, is scaring the heck out of those who were involved. The public can thank Barr. He isnât new to  the internal politicking in Washington D.C. and is well aware of the intelligence and law enforcement apparatus. He is also very familiar with all the players involved.
And they are fighting back with whatever ammo they have left. The ammunition is disinformation and gaslighting the public using main stream outlets. It is a war and they are in the final battle using everything at their disposal to go after the one man that can expose all of it: Barr.
However, it wonât work. As they say in old detective movies âthe jig is upâ and the American people, along with the DOJ, have seen enough evidence to prove that the bureauâs probe was fraught with problems.
It was spying. Plain and simple.
Barr should know, he worked with the CIA early in his career.
He also is not worried about being âpolitically correctâ to benefit the Democrats grilling him before the Senate Judiciary Committee and no matter how many tantrums they throw it isnât going to stop him from getting to truth.
Published on May 28, 2019


By Jose Nino
A video that President Donald Trump recently shared on social media has been making waves during the past few days. Critics argued that the video was digitally modified in order to make Pelosi appear to be impaired while giving a speech.
Trump shared a Fox news video from âLou Dobbs Tonightâ that showed numerous verbal pauses from the House Speaker.
Hurd commented on CBSâs âFace the Nationâ that âYou shouldnât disseminate information that you know is ultimately doctored.â
The Texas congressman argued that âthis is going to escalate this debate and this fight.â
He added that âWe have old laws to decide how you handle disinformationâ and that America has âleaders that donât understand how this technology can be used in the future.â
Hurd concluded with the following:
âThis goes back into this whole conversation around disinformation and how are we dealing with it, and itâs not just the government alone. Itâs not just the social media companies. Itâs also the media, academia involved in trying to do this.â
Hurd has built a track record in the House for siding with the establishment on issues like universal gun registration and his vote to end the government shutdown without funding President Trumpâs border wall. Before Trump was elected, Hurd was a strong opponent of Trump saying that âTrump should step aside for âa true conservativeâ to step in.â
For that reason, it is no surprise why Hurd is attacking Trump at the moment.
