Report: Democrat Leader Jerry Nadler’s Son Works for Firm Suing Trump – This is Material Real Conflict of Interest – He Must Recuse!

CAP

 

Another material conflict of interest perpetrated by the Democrat Party. Dem House Leader Jerry Nadler has a son working for a firm suing President Trump. How is this legal?

The Mueller team was conflicted to the hilt with numerous members having donated to, worked for or represented the Hillary team or the Democrat Party.  Now the Democrats have another major conflict of interest.

It’s reported that the Head of the House Oversight Committee, Democrat Jerry Nadler, has a son who works for a law firm suing President Trump.  According to Big League Politics –

Democrat congressman Jerry Nadler, leading the investigative charge against President Donald Trump, has a son whose firm is trying to get access to Trump documents for their clients in numerous lawsuits against President Trump.

“Congressman Jerry Nadler has a big conflict,” our source tells Big League Politics in Washington, D.C.

“His son (Michael Nadler) got a job with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP in 2018.  That’s convenient because Jerry Nadler and the Democrats just won control of the House in 2018.  Gibson Dunn & Crutcher hire Jerry’s son and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher are the main Nemesis against Trump and the Trump Administration on numerous lawsuits.  Now the Nadler family will gain access to thousands of Trump documents via Jerry’s subpoenas!,” our insider stated.

Michael Nadler has a LinkedIn account that confirms he works for Gibson Dunn and Crutcher.

CAP

He also brags about receiving an award for helping sanctuary families –

CAP

The young Nadler also brags about working for far-left New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and Eric Schneiderman, the New York Attorney General who resigned after being accused of abuse by at least four women.

CAP

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher represented CNN’s Jim Acosta in his ban by the Trump White House.

They also have sued the U.S. State Department on behalf of the Center for Reproductive Rights, as part of the group’s effort to unearth details of the Trump administration’s alleged changes to regularly issued government human rights reports.  (They don’t like that President Trump took Obama era reporting out of a government report that detailed concerns about abortion rights.)

In the days up to the 2016 election, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher offered to represent Trump sex accusers for free.

Jerry Nadler has a material conflict of interest and he should recuse himself from anything related to President Trump!  This is real and egregious.

Disgraced NY AG used campaign cash to defend against sex abuse claims

screen shot 2019-01-30 at 10.57.48 am

Former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman used funds from his reelection campaign to pay for his legal defense during an investigation into allegations he slapped, choked, and otherwise abused multiple women.

Schneiderman, who portrayed himself as a champion for women and gallant #MeToo supporter while in office, resigned suddenly last May, hours after reports from four women claiming he’d slapped or choked them surfaced in a New Yorker article. It was the ultimate irony for the state AG, who had filed a lawsuit seeking better compensation for the women accusing Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault and misconduct earlier that year.

Using campaign funds to pay for legal defense does not break any rules in New York, as long as it involves matters related to an elected official’s duties. Responses to the revelations – reported by AP, based on Schneiderman’s own campaign finance reports – have not been kind to the fallen prosecutor.

“What a luxury to be able to assault women who donated to your campaign and then use the money to defend yourself,” said Michelle Manning Barish, a Democratic activist who accused Schneiderman of abusing her while they were dating in 2013. She was horrified to find out he’d paid for his legal defense out of the contributions of women like her, saying: “That money was given in good faith by donors who expected Mr. Schneiderman to help women.”

screen shot 2019-01-30 at 11.00.15 am

Schneiderman made his last payment to law firm Clayman & Rosenberg LLP in December, for a total of $339,710, a month after a special prosecutor closed the investigation without filing charges. The ex-AG did release a somewhat equivocal statement afterward, declaring he accepted “full responsibility for my conduct in my relationships with my accusers, and for the impact it had on them.”

One could say Schneiderman got his money’s worth, dodging charges for a sum amounting to less than half his re-election committee’s spending in the eight months following his resignation. He also continued to rent a Manhattan office and pay employee wages.

“Once the committee has honored all its commitments, the remaining funds will be donated to worthy and appropriate causes, consistent with the law,” a spokeswoman for Schneiderman said. The committee did refund about $1.5 million in contributions, but still has about $6.5 million in the bank. Barish called on donors to demand that the rest is given to charities for battered women and abuse survivors.

Spending campaign cash on legal defense is almost an institution in New York politics. Both former State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R) and former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D) spent millions of campaign dollars fighting corruption charges in recent years, though they were both eventually convicted.

“The system is a scandal,” said Blair Horner, executive director of the New York Public Interest Research Group.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑