Published on Mar 17, 2019
VIDEO: CA TRUMP SUPPORTER PELTED IN HEAD WITH CAN ‘FULL OF BONG WATER’
“A perfect illustration: an empty can full of bong water.”
MARCH 18, 2019
Only in the land of “tolerance” would a Trump supporter be assaulted with a can “full of bong water.”
Vlogger Ben Bergquam and a number of Trump supporters took to a street corner in Temecula, California on Saturday to wave American flags and rally for the President.
As Bergquam was speaking into his camera, he was hit in the back of the head with an object.
“We drive all around town with these flags,” one of the Trump supporters said. “We get a lot of positive feedback.”
“You know it’s funny, people think of California as all crazy liberals that have lost their minds—” Bergquam was adding just as he got hit.
“Well, there’s one of them right there!” he exclaimed, bouncing back from the head shot.
“So a guy just threw a soda can at me and hit me in the back of the head,” Bergquam continued line an intrepid reporter.
He then walked back to the evidence laying on the sidewalk.
“This is the left there, guys, perfect example of the left, right there, full soda can,” he continued as the camera showed the crushed can on the cement.
“That’s not soda,” a woman said in the background.
“No, it’s like bong water,” Bergquam responded as he smelled the liquid.
“This is how pathetic these guys are, guys. So this guy just came by, had this bong water in his car…” Bergquam said as someone added, “Threw it at kids.”
“This is the kind of disrespect we have in our country,” Bergquam said. “You know what thought? It doesn’t stop us.
“It only gives us courage to keep going.”
Bergquam said he was keeping the cherry 7UP can to remind himself how “pathetic” the left is.
“A perfect illustration: an empty can full of bong water,” he said.
Watch:
Virginia Senator Thinks Trump ‘Emboldens’ White Supremacists, Silent on Racist Ralph Northam
Virginia Democrats might consider getting their own house in order before pointing fingers.
By
Despite the glaring fact that Gov. Ralph Northam (D-Va.) is an obvious racist who has not faced repercussions after Big League Politics exposed him for wearing a KKK robe or blackface during his time in medical school, a U.S. Senator from that state condemned President Donald J. Trump, linking him to white supremacy.
‘The president uses language often that’s very similar to the language used by these bigots and racists. And if he’s not going to call it out then other leaders have to do more to call it out and I certainly will,” Sen. Tim Kaine (D- Va.) said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday morning.
“Well they have problems but- I think the president is using language that emboldens them. He’s not creating them. They’re out there. But you know at the same time as he was tweeting out yesterday his support for the family members in New Zealand, and that was appropriate, he was vetoing the Senate’s rejection of his emergency declaration from Thursday. And he used the word invaders to characterize people coming to the nation’s southern borders which was exactly the same phrase that the shooter in New Zealand used to characterize the Muslims that he was attacking. That kind of language from the person who probably has the loudest microphone on the planet Earth is hurtful and dangerous and it tends to incite violence,” Kaine continued.
Perhaps the Democratic Party of Virginia should get its own house in order before levying accusations of “racism” against Trump. The state’s third most senior politician, Attorney Mark Herring, also a Democrat, admitted to wearing blackface in college too.
Trending: IT’S HAPPENING: Fox News Pulls Judge Jeanine Off The Air
Herring originally called on Northam to resign, but then backed off his call after admitting to his racism, and after Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax, another Democrat, was credibly accused of sexual assault by two women. Kaine’s compatriot Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) did the same thing.
This is proof positive that Democrats do not actually care about racism. They care about weaponizing race to use it as a political tool against Republicans, which is neither moral nor virtuous.
CNN Receives ‘First Amendment Award’ After Working to Silence Infowars
Tucker Carlson slams network celebrating censorship
Friday, March 15, 2019
The hypocrisy of CNN chief Jeff Zucker being bestowed with a trophy for ‘protecting’ free speech after his network aggressively lobbied for the deplatforming of Alex Jones and Infowars was not lost on Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
Carlson blasted the spectacle of Zucker’s prizewinning at the Radio Television Digital News Foundation’s First Amendment Awards ceremony in Washington, D.C.
“Whatever you think of Jeff Zucker, he is not encumbered by shame,” Carlson said. “Keep in mind that it was his network, CNN, that argued in public that Fox News should not be allowed to ask any questions of the candidates in the Democratic primary debates — that just happened.”
“It was also CNN that demanded radio show host Alex Jones be silenced because Jeff Zucker didn’t like what he was saying.”
“CNN waged a long campaign against Jones; it worked. Jeff Zucker silenced and deplatformed his show,” Carlson continued. “It was a stunning defeat for free speech. So naturally, Jeff Zucker just won the First Amendment award.”
Deadline Hollywood described the awards dinner as a “Trump-trashing” bonanza, with mainstream media operatives accusing President Trump of endangering the lives of the press.
Zucker said the President’s administration “quite literally… put our lives at risk with their words and their actions,” and also, “does not tolerate a free and independent press.”
CNN contributor Carl Bernstein introduced Zucker, saying, “We’re here tonight at a deadly serious moment even as we celebrate.”
“I don’t know of a moment that’s more perilous for the country, for reporting, for the truth and for the First Amendment.”
Interestingly, Fox News anchor Shep Smith, who is regarded by many as one of the most left-leaning personalities on the network, was also granted an award, while Carlson’s show was reportedly not even nominated.
Smith was congratulated by Zucker, who said he “greatly” admires the Fox host.
WATCH: Jeb! Calls For Republican Challenger To Trump In 2020
Former 2016 presidential hopeful and Florida governor Jeb Bush called for a Republican to challenge President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election bid, for the good of conservatives and for the country.
During an appearance on the podcast “The Axe Files,” hosted by CNN senior political commentator and former Barack Obama presidential campaign chief strategist David Axelrod, Bush said Republicans “ought to be a given a choice” in 2020.
“I think someone should run. Just because Republicans ought to be given a choice,” Bush told Axelrod, according to CNN.
Trump has a “has a strong, loyal base and it’s hard to beat a sitting president,” he noted. “But to have a conversation about what it is to be a conservative I think is important.”
“And our country needs to have competing ideologies that people — that are dynamic, that focus on the world we’re in and the world we’re moving towards rather than revert back to a nostalgic time,” Bush added.
As noted by CNN, Axelrod brought up a 2020 Republican challenger to Trump in the context of Bush’s own support of Governor Larry Hogan (R-MD). The Republican’s January inauguration speech sparked reports of Hogan throwing his hat in the ring come 2020 campaign time.
Hogan is “at the top of a list of leaders that I admire today because what’s happening here in Annapolis is the antithesis of what’s happening in Washington, DC, these days,” Bush said of Hogan.
“I didn’t realize I was part of his pre-campaign,” explained the former 2016 candidate. “I kind of got a sense that maybe this was an opening, at least, for (Hogan) to consider (a presidential run).”
Hogan told CNN that he has spoken to people about potentially running in 2020. “People are talking to me about it,” he said. “I’m flattered people are saying that and including me in those discussions. My focus, my plan right now is to stay here for four years and do the best job I can in Maryland, but I’ve said, ‘You never say never.’ Who knows what’s going to happen.”
Tensions between Bush and Trump often boiled during the battle for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.
Trump famously branded Bush as “low energy” and mocked him for getting his “mommy” involved in the race; Bush denounced Trump as an unserious bully, among other jabs between the two.
In January 2016, for example, Trump mocked Bush for having his mother Barbara Bush appear in a campaign ad for him. “Just watched Jeb’s ad where he desperately needed mommy to help him. Jeb — mom can’t help you with ISIS, the Chinese or with Putin,” Trump posted to Twitter.
Trump also tied the “low energy” descriptor to Bush as often as possible, such as this tweet from March, 2016: “Low energy Jeb Bush just endorsed a man he truly hates, Lyin’ Ted Cruz. Honestly, I can’t blame Jeb in that I drove him into oblivion!”
Bush said Trump was a “candidate of chaos,” a “bully,” and “not a serious candidate” during a 2015 CNN appearance.
Bush’s appearance on “The Axe Files” is set to air on Saturday.
WATCH:
CNN’S ATTACK ON TUCKER CARLSON BACKFIRES BIG TIME!
Published on Mar 14, 2019
CNN goes into full attack mode as Tucker Carlson gets “Alex Jonesified” and targeted for deplatforming.
No charges after Martin County bus aide pulled ‘MAGA’ hat off teen’s head
Published on Mar 15, 2019
The state attorney’s office announced Thursday a Martin County bus aide will not face charges after she was caught on camera grabbing a student’s “Make America Great Again” hat.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Uses New Zealand Mosque Terror to Attack NRA
By Joel B. Pollak
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) used the news of the terror attack at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, on Friday by attacking the National Rifle Association (NRA).
The attack, which occurred during Friday prayers, has killed 49 people as of this writing, and wounded dozens of others.
In two tweets, Ocasio-Cortez mocked the idea of sending “thoughts and prayers” to the victims of the shootings. After significant pushback, clarified that the target of her criticism was the NRA.
“At 1st I thought of saying, ‘Imagine being told your house of faith isn’t safe anymore.’,” she tweeted.
“But I couldn’t say ‘imagine.’ Because of Charleston. Pittsburgh. Sutherland Springs.
“What good are your thoughts & prayers when they don’t even keep the pews safe?” she concluded.
Advocates of gun control on the left have begun to mass shooting events by disdaining the expression “thoughts and prayers,” treating it as an excuse for legislative inaction rather than as a genuine expression of sympathy and anguish.
Left-wing critics have also taken to using the phrase “thoughts and prayers” as a way to mock the NRA even outside the context of a shooting event. Last year, for example, liberal celebrities wished “thoughts and prayers” to the NRA after reports that it was having financial trouble.
In that vein, Ocasio-Cortez added a subsequent tweet to clarify her meaning in the original one:
The NRA had not (and, as of the writing, still has not) reacted to the Christchurch attacks. There is also no evidence that it invented the phrase “thoughts and prayers.”
Moreover, New Zealand already has gun control measures similar to those Democrats want to pass into law in the United States, including the universal background check bill that the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed last month.
The NRA has argued that a better way to stop mass shootings would be to encourage responsible gun ownership and make armed guards available to vulnerable targets like schools.
Early reports from Christchurch indicated that an armed Muslim man helped chase away assailants from the second mosque that was attacked.
Ocasio-Cortez also retweeted an attack blaming President Donald Trump for inspiring the New Zealand terrorists.
WALSH: I Bought A Lamborghini But Now I Don’t Want To Pay For It. I Demand Lamborghini Loan Forgiveness.
By MATT WALSH
Not long ago, I went to my local luxury car dealership and purchased a $250,000 Lamborghini. I say I “purchased” the vehicle, but what I mean, of course, is that I took out a massive loan in order to obtain the bright yellow Italian sports car. You should understand that I had no job, no assets, and a net worth of exactly $127 at the time of the transaction. I figured that I would eventually come up with the money to pay for it. Things did not work out as well as I had planned.
I have discovered, much to my shock, that it is quite unpleasant to be in debt. I have to make payments every month, according to the agreement that I knowingly and purposefully signed. Apparently, the lender really wants the money back. I thought maybe they were joking or being sarcastic when they sat me down and said: “This is how much you will owe and this is what your monthly payments will be.” I could have sworn I saw the guy wink, as if to say, “This is all a formality — you don’t really have to make good on the loan. Have fun and don’t worry about it.” Now I suspect that maybe his eye was just twitching from some sort of nerve damage.
Here I am, then, with the debt I agreed to take on for the sake of the product I intentionally purchased. But the financial obligation is hard. It makes my life difficult. I wake up in cold sweats wondering how this happened to me. Well, practically speaking, I know how it happened. I went and took out a loan and now I have to pay it back. Look deeper, though, and you’ll discover that it’s not my fault. I am the victim here.
First of all, you need a car in this day and age. I had no choice but to buy one. Sure, some people get by without cars. It’s technically possible to survive without a car. For a while, anyway, until you die from exhaustion, or hypothermia, or you get eaten by wolves or whatever, because you have to walk everywhere. The point is, I’m not going to be some plebe wandering down the sidewalk. That lifestyle might work for some people — less interesting, less important people — but not me. I’m me, after all, for God’s sake.
Now, you might argue that I could have easily purchased an affordable vehicle. I didn’t have to spend six figures on a car when there are thousands of different options and many of those options wouldn’t result in a mountain of debt. I could have bought a really cheap used vehicle, driven it around for a while, and then eventually traded it for a nicer model once I had the money and means to afford it. Or I could have consigned myself to the miserable life of a pedestrian for a period of time — a few years, at most — while I earned a living, saved money, and put myself in a better position to purchase a quality automobile. There are many things I could have done, you might say. But that’s because you don’t understand.
I needed the nicest car, right away, immediately, no matter the cost. Those “responsible” plans you mention might work for other people, but, like I’ve already explained, I’m not other people. I’m a special case. There are certain things life owes me: Status, popularity, luxury, Lamborghinis. Don’t you see how this works? It is not the lender who is owed. Rather, I am the one who is owed. So, I did what was right for me. Even if it wasn’t right for me. You are not entitled to any more of an explanation. You should be satisifed with that. Why are we even talking about you, anyway? This is about me, remember? Let’s not lose sight of the real issue.
I propose — no, I demand — Lamborghini loan forgiveness. It is simply unfair that I have saddled myself with this unspeakable financial burden. It is the worst injustice I have ever perpetrated against myself, and I demand restitution. I don’t really care how the matter is resolved, just as long as it ends with me cruising debt-free down the highway in my bright yellow Lambo. Yes, I will be keeping the car. I’m not asking for a refund here — I’m talking about forgiveness. The debt should be wiped clean. Like it never happened. Poof. Gone.
Who is going to pay back the lender? Again, not my concern. If, for some reason, restitution is necessary, then take the money from my neighbor. He paid off the loan on his Honda Civic years ago. He’s got plenty of extra money lying around, I’m sure. It is perfectly just to force someone else to assume my financial responsibilities. I remind you for the umpteenth time: This is me we’re talking about. I would never want to force my neighbor to pay off some random rube’s car, or boat, or patio, or whatever. That would be totally immoral. It would be stealing. It’s unthinkable. But I’m not a random rube. I’m special. I’m important. I have a Lamborghini. Now someone just needs to pay for it.
Tom's Blog 