WATCH Reporter Asks Ilhan Omar, ‘Did You Marry Your Brother?’

By

A reporter for The Rebel confronted Ilhan Omar about her multiple marriages, as Omar stands accused of immigration fraud for allegedly marrying her own brother to get him into the country.

Can the Minneapolis Star Tribune be trusted with any real reporting when it comes to Ilhan Omar? Most probably not, given their love affair with the Somali immigrant woman who is currently running for Congress in Minnesota’s fifth Congressional district.

Big League Politics was recently tipped off by someone who visited Star Tribune’soffice, and took a picture of a painting of Ilhan Omar hanging on wall at the Minneapolis newspaper headquarters.

Next to the portrait there is a framed biography of Omar, and a dramatic retelling of her journey from a refugee camp to Minnesota politics.

Among Omar’s greatest legislative achievements in the Minnesota House since she was elected in 2016:

  • Opposing a ban on insurance payments to suicide terrorists
  • Opposing a ban on Female Genital Mutilation.

That’s right, Ilhan Omar wants US insurance companies to pay out life insurance policies to jihadists who get killed while waging jihad overseas against the United States and our allies. She’s also against banning Female Genital Mutilation – a barbaric Islamic practice of maiming young girls by cutting off their clitoris.

“Asked about having her portrait painted, Ilhan said since she was elected in 2016, all of a sudden she sees painting or drawings of her on social media quite frequently,” the biography reads.

No doubt a celebrity politician has emerged in our midst, and who are we not to be impressed with her?

Could it be because there is now strong evidence Ilhan Omar committed immigration fraud and married her brother so she could get him into the US?

Recently, David Steinberg from PJ Media reported that official school records indeed support the claims she married her brother. Steinberg has turned his discoveries over to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota.

“As this implicates Rep. Omar in multiple state and federal felonies, I have contacted the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota to submit all other information uncovered during our investigation,” said Steinberg.

What about the multiple MN House Ethics Violations? Accepting payments for speaking at colleges she was going to vote on receiving subsidies from the state; using campaign resources for travel expenses and divorce fees.

These are the kind of things you won’t read about in the biography hanging on the wall at the Star Tribune, which pretends to be objective.

The latest campaign finance violations were discovered discovered by MN Rep. Steve Drazkowski in the 2017 year-end report for Omar’s campaign committee. The report showed over $3,000 in travel-related disbursements, including airfare to Estonia and travel expenses to Massachusetts so Omar could speak at a rally for a Boston City Council candidate.

“What we are seeing before our eyes is a serial violator of our laws,” Drazkowski said.

However, the Star Tribune doesn’t see any such issues. Instead the newspaper has been working hard to sell to Minnesotans the image of a suffering refugee with a magical story turning her into a charming success story for multiculturalism, the newest utopia of the Left.

When confronted with these allegations by her Republican opponent Jennifer Zielinski, Omar is quick to avoid giving any real answers, to counter-attack and insult Rep. Drazkowski whom she called a “sad, overzealous representative” in a recent interview at the Minnesota Public Radio. In the same interview, Omar complains about life in the United States and vows to vote for the impeachment of the President if elected to U.S. Congress. When asked whether she used campaign funds for travel and for her divorce, Omar denies any wrongdoing.

She hasn’t denied however her 2013 trespassing arrest and booking at Hennepin County Jail “to prevent further criminal conduct,” according to a newly uncovered police report. Again, the Star Tribune remained silent on the discover made by Alpha News.

Currently, in the lead, Ilhan Omar is set to “inherit” Keith Ellison’s seat in U.S. Congress while he seems to be failing in his campaign for Minnesota Attorney General amid numerous allegations of domestic violence that have been brought against him.

No doubt the bias of the liberal Minnesota media has been a huge factor in turning Minnesota into a hotbed for Islamic terrorists, a hub for mega-Muslim events, and a launchpad for Muslim candidates who commit fraud and demonstrate defiance for the law even while seeking political offices.

Mexican Officials Confirm U.S. Warned Them About Suspected ISIS Terrorists Headed to Border

CAP

By Ildefonso Ortiz and Brandon Darby

Mexican authorities are on high alert regarding three ISIS-linked terror suspects who are believed to be making their way from Central America to Mexico and potentially the U.S. border. Authorities were warned the suspects could try to enter Mexico within a large migrant group or with the help of human smugglers.

CAP

Breitbart News exclusively confirmed that Mexican Federal Police are on alert, preparing to encounter or arrest Ahamed Ghanim Mohamed Al Juburi from Iraq, and Ibrahim Mohamed and Mohamed Eissa from Egypt. The three men are believed to have entered through Panama in May, crossed through Costa Rica on June 9, and could be headed to Mexico, a leaked internal security memo revealed. The documents make reference to BITMAP, the U.S. Homeland Security Investigations’ Biometric Identification Transnational Migration Alert Program, a collection of databases on “special interest aliens, violent criminals, fugitives and confirmed or suspected terrorists encountered within illicit pathways.”

CAP

CAP

Antifa Put Up Posters Doxing Tucker Carlson After He Spoke Out Against Iran War

By Chris Menahan – JUNE 24, 2019

While Tucker Carlson was working overtime encouraging President Trump not to go to war with Iran, antifa was busy putting up posters smearing him as an “alt-right racist” and sharing his family’s home address throughout Washington, DC.

As I reported over the past week, Tucker Carlson not only spoke out against the prospect of a war with Iran on his show but also allegedly spoke privately with President Trump and told him not to go to war with Iran.

His effort was successful (at least for the time being) with President Trump deciding not to strike Iran late Thursday night and it caused the establishment’s cronies to throw a fit.

As Tucker was working to prevent World War III, the antifa group “All Out DC” went to work attacking him and shared posters like the one below doxing his family’s home address.

Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 10.36.44 AM

Twitter deleted some of their tweets but allowed the group to keep their account:

Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 10.37.41 AM
Though the supposed pretext for sharing these signs was to protest a July 4th “Demand Free Speech” event, Tucker is not even an attendee.

Interestingly, the group don’t appear to have directed any of the same hatred towards Sean Hannity, who at the same time Tucker was speaking out against war with Iran was telling his viewers that Trump needs to “bomb the hell out” of Iran or else it’s mathematically guaranteed there will be another holocaust.

Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 10.40.39 AM
Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 10.41.47 AM
The fact these groups are so out to get Tucker Carlson — the most prominent anti-war voice on all of TV — should give us a clue as to whom they serve.

Watch: U.S. Navy Releases Video of Drone Shoot Down over Strait of Hormuz

By Simon Kent

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) released vision Friday morning that confirms a U.S. Navy Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (or BAMS-D) ISR Global Hawk drone was lost to an Iranian surface-to-air missile.

The downed aircraft is large–wingspan the size of a Boeing 757–and designed for high altitude spy missions.

The command said the $240 million unmanned aircraft was operating in international airspace over the Strait of Hormuz at approximately 11:35 p.m. GMT on June 19, 2019 when it was lost.

CENTCOM refuted Iranian reports that the aircraft was over its territory. Iran, for its part, released footage of its own that allegedly shows the drone being taken out by a surface-to-air missile:

The vision from both sides was made public at the same time the New York Times reported President Donald Trump ordered air and naval strikes against Iranian targets in response to the attack but canceled them “abruptly.”

Northrop Grumman, manufacturer of the RQ-4 Global Hawk, describes it as a “premier provider of persistent intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance information.”

The attack by Iran came just 48-hours after the Pentagon released new images which officials said offered more evidence operatives from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were responsible for last week’s attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman.

CENSORSHIP: WordPress De-Platforms Blog That Posted Statistics About Muslims

WordPress continues to censor blogs that it deems inappropriate.

A blog that posted statistics about Muslims has been squashed from WordPress in an apparent effort to censor information that might portray the “religion of peace” in a negative light.

The site, called muslimstatistics.wordpress.com was suspended for an alleged terms of service violation:

One of the pieces from the website, archived here, shows that the content was in no way malicious. Rather, it was factual.

“USA: Muslim ‘refugees’ – 91.4% on food stamps, 68.3% on Cash Welfare,” said the headline of a post from 2015.

To prove its claim, the site used a chart from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – a federal government entity:

The post then simply explained the chart:

The statistics in the chart are provided by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  The ORR figures defined refugees from the “Middle East” as being from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and Yemen.

During the time period referenced in the chart (FY2008 to FY2013), the United States admitted 115,617 refugees from the Middle East and granted asylum to another 10,026.  Also during this 5-year time frame, according to the Department of Homeland Security, the United States granted permanent admission to a total of 308,805 individuals from these same 10 Middle Eastern countries (designated as refugee-sending nations) through the issuance of green cards.

These government statistics were apparently too inflammatory for WordPress, who decided to censor the blog.

WordPress recently took down another blog, Creeping Sharia, that chronicled the misdeeds of Muslims in the West.

Big League Politics reported:

A blog that chronicled the rise of Sharia in the West and the persecution of Christians worldwide was told abruptly by WordPress Monday that its content was no longer welcome on the platform.

In an automated message, Creeping Sharia was informed that it had violated WordPress’ terms of service, and that it was no longer welcome to use the platform. The message said:

Upon review of your  site we have determined that your content does not align with our Terms of Service or User Guidelines. As stated in our Terms, we may choose to stop providing service to an account at any time, for any reason, or none at all. As such, your site has been suspended and will not be returned.

Creeping Sharia’s apparent crime was reporting stories like Islamist terror attacks that killed Christians in Nigeria, or that Mohammad was the number one name for baby boys in Berlin, Germany in 2018.

The site describes itself on Twitter as “Documenting news on the threat of Islamic sharia law and jihad to freedoms in the U.S., and beyond.”

The topic of censorship by Big Tech is at the forefront of political discourse.

The purge of Creeping Sharia is the latest in a wave of de-platforming by large technology platforms.

Old wine, new bottles: Twitter’s ‘simplified’ rules are just as vague and arbitrary

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.21.13 AM

Twitter has revamped its rules, cutting them into tweet-sized morsels in the name of a “healthier public conversation.” Just as opaque and patronizing as before, they’re now even more likely to get you banned. Move over, YouTube!

Twitter has presented its users with a reformulated “easier to understand” set of rules, moving most of the text off the main page for a pleasing aesthetic experience and upping the chance users will never read the detailed policies. The byzantine and often self-contradictory conduct code is chock full of pitfalls, and users are quickly finding out the range of bannable offenses has swollen to rival YouTube’s and Facebook’s.

“Private Information,” “Sensitive Media” and “Terrorism & Violent Extremism” are the subsections advertised on the new rules page as having received a makeover, but reading through them is likely to leave the user even more confused than before. “We also prohibit the glorification of violence,” the tweet-sized takeaway under “violence and extremism” reads, but if you click through to the actual policy page, it turns out “violent acts by state actors” get a pass.

Non-state actors – including Vox blogger Carlos Maza, whose complaints have been blamed for triggering Wednesday’s mass deplatforming on YouTube – have also gotten away with what could fall under “glorification of violence,” as some were quick to point out, noting their accounts had not only survived but thrived during the latest “purge.”

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.28.31 AM

Another user raised the question of why Twitter would ask for government-issued identification in the course of a suspension appeal, and where that information might end up – considering how fellow tech giant Google hands over the personal data of tens of thousands of users yearly at the government’s request.

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.29.40 AM

Twitter’s notoriously-vague hate speech rules have not been clarified – if anything, they’ve grown even more complex. There’s a “hateful conduct” policy and an “abuse/harassment” policy, the latter of which includes “hoping that someone experiences physical harm,” handing even more ammunition to the opponents of ‘thought police’.

Still want to get somebody banned but can’t find a rationale under the new and improved hate speech/harassment rules? Twitter has thoughtfully included a catch-all, menacingly vague prohibition against “platform manipulation” that echoes the “coordinated inauthentic behavior” reason Facebook gave for deplatforming hundreds of politically-active accounts before the 2018 US midterm elections.

“You may not use Twitter’s services in a manner intended to artificially amplify or suppress information or engage in behavior that manipulates or disrupts people’s experience on Twitter.”

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.31.51 AM

The page warns users against tweeting too much, following too many people, “aggressively adding users to lists,” trying to make accounts “appear more popular or active than they are,” and tweeting with “excessive, unrelated hashtags” – among dozens more no-nos. But “hobby/artistic bots” are apparently OK – a ready-made loophole for the likes of New Knowledge, the American Democrat-linked “experts” who ran an army of fake “Russian bots.”

The new rules don’t explain the “unusual behavior” that has apparently become grounds for banning, and many users took the opportunity to lash out at the platform for its censorship.

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.34.06 AM

Parody accounts are supposedly still allowed, though someone apparently forgot to tell whoever deplatformed the latest AOC parody account on Tuesday.

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.35.16 AM

The new, improved Twitter rules dropped less than 24 hours after the #VoxAdpocalypse left hundreds of YouTubers demonetized or even deleted for so-called “supremacist content” – a vague term which in practice seems to have translated to “conservative political speech,” since most white supremacist content had already been removed from the platform in earlier purges and “supremacist” content of any other kind appears to have been largely left alone.

‘This will not go well’: YouTube cracks down on pundits & journalists after policy change

Screen Shot 2019-06-07 at 11.37.30 AM

Dutch Ministry of Justice covered up ‘serious crimes’ by asylum seekers. Rape, battery, murder, etc. listed unspecified as “Other”

By   

Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf reveals attempts by the Ministry of Justice and Safety to obfuscate the amount of crime committed by asylum seekers. In an article published on 16 May, the paper writes that despite promises of openness, the Ministry has attempted to hide serious crimes by misnaming them ‘other incidents’. Those ‘other incidents’ include rape cases and child abuse.

This deliberate attempt at misleading the public comes after De Telegraaf had to resort to legal steps in 2017 to get data on crimes committed by asylum seekers. Then, the Ministry denied keeping a separate registration, claiming it had no figures to release. In reality, the police kept statistics, with De Telegraafclaiming the sheer volume of the files kept the authorities from releasing the information.

In what the paper dubs a ‘painful affair’, two years later the Ministry is up to its old tricks again. The aim is yet again to obscure: it is the Ministry that grouped a 1000 ‘other crimes’, and yet again De Telegraaf had to resort to police sources to fill in the deliberate blanks.

Of the 1000 ‘others’, 79 were sexual offences, ranging from sexual assault, to sexual abuse of children, to rape, to possession of child pornography. Police were called for 51 cases of battery, 31 cases of murder or manslaughter. There were 5 counts of kidnap or hostage taking, 4 times it was for human trafficking, and 73 times there was a disturbance of the peace.

The Ministry, meanwhile, professes its innocence. A spokesperson blames the police for not giving exact enough data. But the fact that the police has the information, implies that the Ministry could have demanded the information, according to Jasper van Dijk, MP. He concludes that “it is remarkable that the Ministry didn’t report this [want of information], this is a lack of transparency. We need to know what we are debating.”

The 1000 ‘other’ crimes paint a less than sterling picture of the situation in and around asylum locations. In total, the police registered 4600 crimes committed by asylum seekers in 2018. Shoplifting (2030 cases) was popular, followed by pickpocketing, stealing purses, physical abuse and making threats.

read the rest of the article here.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑