

Tucker: Mueller has nothing more to say
Published on May 29, 2019

Netflix May Consider Boycotting Filming In Georgia; Conservatives May Consider Boycotting Netflix

“Don’t alienate your pro-life customers. We have lots of streaming options these days.”
By Kassy Dillon
In response to Georgiaâs new law prohibiting aborting babies with a detectable heartbeat, Netflix said that the company may “rethink” filming in Georgia if the law goes into effect. In response, some conservatives are saying they will consider boycotting Netflix if they follow through on the Georgia boycott.
In a statement to Variety, Netflixâs chief content creator Ted Sarandos said the company will work with the ACLU to fight the Georgia law in court.â
“We have many women working on productions in Georgia, whose rights, along with millions of others, will be severely restricted by this law,” Sarandos said. “Itâs why we will work with the ACLU and others to fight it in court.”
He also said Netflix will continue to film in Georgia due to the law not being yet implemented but will still work with partners and artists who choose to boycott the state.
“Should it ever come into effect, weâd rethink our entire investment in Georgia,” Sarandos added.
In response, conservatives are threatening to cancel their subscriptions to Netflix.
Fox News contributor Guy Benson parodied a headline about Netflixâs statement to say that he may boycott the company.
“Benson would rethink Netflix subscription if abortion advocacy stands,” Benson tweeted.

Kira Davis, the Editor-At-Large of RedState, said she is also considering ending her Netflix subscription.
“I enjoy @netflix but thereâs literally nothing on there I canât live without. Iâm totally happy to ‘rethink’ my investment as well. Itâs a two way street, friends!”

Fox News Contributor Lisa Booth also chimed in.
“Works both ways, @netflix. Will gladly cancel my account,” Booth tweeted.

The Daily Wireâs Elisha Krauss said she would use alternative streaming services.
“Fine, Iâll pay for the @Disney app and cancel @Netflix,” Krauss tweeted. “My kids donât need their programming and I can do without Ozark.”

Fox News contributor and Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen warned the streaming service against alienating pro-life customers.
“Hey .@netflix nearly half the country is pro-life,” Thiessen tweeted. “Don’t alienate your pro-life customers. We have lots of streaming options these days.”

Several well-known producers and actors said they will avoid filming in Georgia due to the law, including actress Kristen Wiig who canceled her plans to film her upcoming comedy “Barb and Star Go To Vista Del Mar” in the state.â
In a tweet, producer Mark Duplass announced he would no longer film in Georgia and encouraged others to do the same.
“Donât give your business to Georgia,” Duplass tweeted. “Will you pledge with me not to film anything in Georgia until they reverse this backwards legislation?”

Producers J.J. Abrams and Jordan Peele decided to still film their show “Lovecraft Country” in the state but plan to donate their fees to the ACLU of Georgia and Fair Fight Georgia, reported Bloomberg.â
Georgia is a favorable state for filming due to its generous film and TV subsidies, which have led to the popular show “The Walking Dead” and the hit movie “Black Panther” being filmed there.
Earlier this month Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp signed the “heartbeat bill” into law which bans abortions if a fetal heartbeat can be detected.
“(The bill) is very simple but also very powerful: a declaration that all life has value, that all life matters, and that all life is worthy of protection,” Kemp said at the time. “I realize that some may challenge it in a court of law. But our job is to do what is right, not what is easy. We are called to be strong and courageous, and we will not back down. We will always continue to fight for life.”
MUELLER BREAKS SILENCE – SPECIAL COUNSEL SURPRISE ADDRESS TO THE NATION

By Joshua Caplan
The Department of Justice announced special counsel Robert Mueller will issue a statement on Wednesday morning regarding the âinvestigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election.â

Mueller will speak at the Justice Department at 11 a.m. EST and will not take any questions.
It was not clear what he intended to say, but the statement comes amid demands for Mueller to testify on Capitol Hill about his findings and tension with Attorney General William Barr over the handling of his report.
Muellerâs report into Russia meddling in the 2016 election did not find that Russia and the Trump campaign coordinated to sway the presidential election. It did not reach a conclusion on whether the president had obstructed justice. Barr has said he was surprised that Mueller did not reach a conclusion, and decided with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that the evidence did not support an obstruction of justice allegation.
The attorney general is currently in Alaska for work.
According to CNBCâs Eamon Javers, the White House was told Tuesday evening that Mueller was planning on issuing a statement Wednesday.

The development comes after negotiations about Muellerâs tentative testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on May 15th fell through.
The House panelâs chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) said earlier this month that talks will continue with Mueller and the Justice Department about the testimony. The New York Democrat wouldnât characterize those talks, though he said he expects Mueller to eventually appear, and if he wonât agree the committee will attempt to compel him.
âIf necessary weâll subpoena him and heâll come,â Nadler said.
The negotiations over Muellerâs appearance come as Democrats are clashing with the Justice Department over access to Muellerâs full report on the Trump-Russia investigation. The Judiciary panel on recently voted to hold Barr in contempt of Congress after he defied the committeeâs subpoena for an unredacted version of the report.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.Â

Tucker: It wasn’t ‘spying,’ it was ‘investigating’
Former FBI director James Comey claims spying on the 2016 Trump campaign was normal.

Barr Is The Man For The Job. It Scares The Heck Out Of Those Heâs Investigating.

By Sara Carter
Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr is the perfect man for the job. He is methodical, attentive, calm and rides the storm of chaos with the demeanor of a man who knows he is standing on the side of truth.
It is evident that former senior Obama administration officials and opponents of President Trump know that and fear it. It began last night with the ânon-storyâ that Special Counsel Robert Mueller prosecutors werenât happy with Barrâs four page letter explaining their report on the Russia investigation.
âWe did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision,â Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
âWe donât conduct criminal investigations just to collect information and put it out to the public. We do so to make a decision,â Barr told lawmakers. He suggested that Mueller should have come to a decision but avoided the criticism of Democrats by passing the ball to him with regard to obstruction.
Barrâs Testimony To Senate Judiciary Committee
It was also apparent in the opinion editorial placed in the New York Times by disgraced and fired former Director of the FBI James Comey. Comey challenged Barrâs use of the word âspying.â Thatâs exactly what Comeyâs office did to the Trump campaign even if the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court sanctioned the bureauâs probe into former Trump campaign volunteers, like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
âHow could Mr. Barr, a bright and accomplished lawyer, start channeling the president in using words like âno collusionâ and F.B.I. âspyingâ? And downplaying acts of obstruction of justice as products of the presidentâs being âfrustrated and angry,â something he would never say to justify the thousands of crimes prosecuted every day that are the product of frustration and anger,â wrote Comey.
Channeling the president? What is Comey talking about. Mueller found no evidence of conspiracy with Russia and Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, found no grounds for obstruction.
The use of the word âspyingâ is a common phrase used for exactly what it is meant. Just look it up in Websterâs Dictionary.
However, Comey is well aware that the public fight is all he has left. He is walking a legal tight rope and he knows it.
If there is anyone who was channeling anybody, it was Comey. He channeled the words of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch when he called the investigation into Hillary Clintonâs use of a private sever to send classified government emails âa matterâ and not an investigation.
He channeled Obama when he uttered the same phrases that Clinton was not âintentionallyâ putting American lives in jeopardy when she sent classified information on a server, our government believes was penetrated by multiple foreign state actors.
Remember what Obama said in April 2016: âHillary Clinton was an outstanding secretary of state. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.â
Comey said months later in July 2016, when he exonerated Clinton: âWe did not find evidence sufficient to establish that she knew she was sending classified information beyond a reasonable doubt to meet the intent standard.â It wasnât about meeting the standard, under the law itâs about gross negligence.
Barr has taken charge. Comey and his crew of FBI cohorts, along with other senior Obama administration officials, have a lot to worry about.
The DOJ is now investigating the origins of the FBIâs investigation and that frankly, is scaring the heck out of those who were involved. The public can thank Barr. He isnât new to  the internal politicking in Washington D.C. and is well aware of the intelligence and law enforcement apparatus. He is also very familiar with all the players involved.
And they are fighting back with whatever ammo they have left. The ammunition is disinformation and gaslighting the public using main stream outlets. It is a war and they are in the final battle using everything at their disposal to go after the one man that can expose all of it: Barr.
However, it wonât work. As they say in old detective movies âthe jig is upâ and the American people, along with the DOJ, have seen enough evidence to prove that the bureauâs probe was fraught with problems.
It was spying. Plain and simple.
Barr should know, he worked with the CIA early in his career.
He also is not worried about being âpolitically correctâ to benefit the Democrats grilling him before the Senate Judiciary Committee and no matter how many tantrums they throw it isnât going to stop him from getting to truth.
Bilderberg 2019: Whoâs going and what will they be discussing?

Roughly 130 world leaders from 23 countries, ranging from royalty to industry and everything in between, will attend the 2019 Bilderberg Group this week, to discuss topics like Russia, Brexit and the future of AI.
The ultra-secretive meeting will take place from Thursday to Sunday in Montreux, Switzerland. Founded in 1954, the notorious meeting is ostensibly aimed at improving relations between the US and Europe, though the event has long been shrouded in mystery and conspiracy theories as attendees are forbidden from disclosing what was discussed.
Many contend it has a far more sinister purpose than mere international relations. Theories range from far-left worries that the groupâs aim is to impose eternal capitalist domination, while some on the right have expressed concerns about the establishment of a world government named the New World Order.

Top politicians, business leaders, financiers and academics usually traditionally rank among the invitees. Among the confirmed 2019 attendees are some powerful titans of the tech industry including Google CEO Eric Schmidt, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, leading bankers from Goldman Sachs and the Bank of England as well as Credit Suisse CEO Tidjane Thiam, and notable world leaders and former politicians including former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg.
Trump adviser Jared Kushner also features on the confirmed guest list while rumors circulate that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo might make an appearance, reportedly to discuss the Iran situation with Swiss Finance Minister Ueli Maurer, though he does not appear on the official guest list. The Swiss Finance Ministry has denied such reports but Switzerland often represents US interests in Iran as a go-between.
US think tank goes big-game hunting for Russia. Guess who gets shot in the foot?

The published 2019 talking points include topics such as Brexit, the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), climate change and sustainability, and the future of space exploration. Russia, China, the future of capitalism, and the weaponization of social media also feature among the loose list of discussion topics. However, meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, meaning participants may use any information gleaned therein but may not disclose its source or their affiliations, so that discussion may take place in a âfree-fireâ zone away from the scrutiny of public discourse. No votes are taken, no policies set and no statements are made at the meeting.
One of the founders of the group, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, said the extreme secrecy was necessary so that âsevere economic dips like the Great Depressions could be avoided if responsible and influential leaders could manage world events behind their necessary public posturing.â
Confirmed past luminaries who have graced the top secret meeting include: Bill Clinton (1991), David Cameron (2013), Bill Gates (2010), Prince Charles (1986), Jeff Bezos (2011, 2013), Margaret Thatcher (1975, 1976 and 1986) and banker David Rockefeller (2008, 2009, 2011).
