Trump Administration Rule Proposal Will Cut 3 Million Undeserving People Off Food Stamps

Screen Shot 2019-07-25 at 11.04.02 AM

By Jeff Dunetz

The Trump administration is proposing a rule change that would cut up to 3.1 million people from the food stamp program, saving taxpayers $2.5 billion annually.

The revised regulation would require people who currently receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, to undergo a separate income review to determine if they are eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Currently, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) officials say, 43 states automatically allow their reside

“Some states are taking advantage of loopholes that allow people to receive the SNAP benefits who would otherwise not qualify and for which they are not entitled,” Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue revealed in a conference call.

Screen Shot 2019-07-25 at 11.07.36 AM

“This proposal will save money and preserve the integrity of the program,” Perdue argued, adding that “SNAP should be a temporary safety net.”

Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) said the rule change is an attempt by the administration to “circumvent Congress and make harmful changes to nutrition assistance that have been repeatedly rejected on a bipartisan basis.”

The Trump administration has argued that a booming economy has helped lower the unemployment rate to full employment, making food stamp assistance less necessary.

When Barack Obama entered office in 2009, about 33 million Americans were enrolled in SNAP. By 2013, that number had shot upto 48 million, an indication of his awful economic programs.

On the other hand, because of his successful economic programs , two million Americans dropped from the food stamp program during Trump’s first year as President, which at that time was the lowest point in eight years.

The President announced earlier this month that “Food Stamp participation hits 10 year low,” a comment verified by left-leaning fact-checking website, Politifact.

During his State of the Union address, President Trump bragged about the roaring economy and its role in changing how more people are working instead of relying on food stamps.

“Wages are rising at the fastest pace if decades and growing for blue-collar workers who I promised to fight for, they’re growing faster than anyone else thought possible,” he said to uproarious applause. “Nearly five million Americans have been lifted off food stamps.”

Work is the most critical way to escape poverty. President Trump s proving that.

Cross-Posted with Mental Recession

Robert Mueller Squirms and Stammers Under Intense Questioning from Matt Gaetz

Gaetz made Mueller squirm while questioning him about Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.

By Shane Trejo

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) blasted former FBI special investigator Robert Mueller during a Congressional hearing today before the House Judiciary Committee regarding Mueller’s unwillingness to address Fusion FPS and their dubious Christopher Steele dossier.

“Director Mueller, can you state with confidence that the Steele dossier was not part of Russia’s disinformation campaign?” Gaetz asked Mueller.

“Uhh ahh, I said, eeh uhh, in my opening statement, ehh uhh, that, uhh, part of the, ehh uhh, building of the case was predated me by at least ten months,” Mueller responded, struggling to spit out a coherent sentence.

“Yeah, and Paul Manafort’s alleged crimes regarding tax evasion predated you, and you had no problem charging him,” Gaetz retorted.

The pro-Trump legislator was just getting warmed up in taking Mueller to task for how he conducted his biased witch hunt.

“As a matter of fact, this Steele dossier predated the Attorney General, and he didn’t have any problem answering the question. When Sen. Cornyn asked the Attorney General the exact question I asked you, Director, the Attorney General said, and I’m quoting, ‘No, I can’t state that with confidence, and that’s one of the areas I’m reviewing. I’m concerned about it, and I don’t think it’s entirely speculative,’” Gaetz told Mueller.

“Now if something is not entirely speculative, then it must have some factual basis, but you identify no factual basis regarding the dossier or the possibility that it was apart of the Russia disinformation campaign,” he added.

Gaetz then began to delve into the details regarding the Steele dossier, which was produced by Fusion GPS via the law firm Perkins Coie funded with cash from the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Committee.

“Steele reported to the FBI that senior Russian foreign ministry figures, along with other Russians, told him that there was, and I’m quoting from the Steele dossier, ‘extensive evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign team and the Kremlin,’” Gaetz said.

“So here’s my question, did Russians really tell that to Christopher Steele or did he just make it all up and was he just lying to the FBI?” Gaetz asked Mueller.

Mueller resorted to his usual defense throughout the day’s questioning, in order to slither out of having to provide a direct answer.

“That’s beyond my purview,” Mueller responded.

Gaetz was not impressed by Mueller’s weasel tactics, and continued to drill him with the facts.

“No, it is exactly your purview, Director Mueller, and here’s why,” Gaetz said. “Only one of two things is possible, right, either, Steele made this whole thing up, and there were never any Russians telling him of this vast criminal conspiracy that you didn’t find, or Russians lied to Steele.”

“Now, if Russians were lying to Steele to undermine our confidence in our duly elected President, that would seem to be precisely your purview because you stated in your opening that the organizing principle was to fully and thoroughly investigate Russia’s interference, but you weren’t interested in whether or not Russians were interfering through Christopher Steele,” he added.

Gaetz’s smack down of Mueller can be viewed in full here:

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 3.22.26 PM

Mueller’s persistent confusion and inability to answer basic questions has many speculating that he was merely a figurehead, and was never responsible for the contents of his own report.

Jack Posobiec of One America News Network contends that the Mueller report was written by Department of Justice attorney Andrew Weissman, a member of Mueller’s team who has extensive ties to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 3.23.49 PM

Today has to be seen as a major victory for Republicans, led by Gaetz, who can now point to Mueller’s muddled testimony as more evidence that his investigation against President Trump regarding Russian collusion was a biased witch hunt.

Mueller Says It Doesn’t Matter His Lawyers Had Connections To Clinton

Published on July 24, 2019

Marcus McCurley
‘Is your full name Robert Mueller’ “‘I can’t go into that’

89

Mike Delmore
Can we get Weissman to answer questions, seems like he would know more.

57

Joaquin Canals
“I don’t want to go into that” Oh, really?!

37

JC N
“Is your name Robert Mueller?” “I don’t wanna go into that”

136

BigMac 3008
It’s like he hasn’t answered a single question

26

Ryan Flint
3:52 Gordon Ramsey is looking rough!😂

35

Apparatchic
Incredible to watch a reputation being dismantled in real-time…

24

Witty Name
They were hired to “do the job” to convince the world what supposedly Trump did is what Hillary actually did.

18

art american
This whole thing was said, by Dems, to clear up the Muller report for comman people .. I gave up counting how many times he said ” I am not going to answer that”. Thanx for the transparency…

45

Tyrone Murray
Muller – i have been in this business for 25 years. And there my friend is the problem Mr Muller is a swamp dweller!

Tucker: The left can’t wait for Mueller on the hill tomorrow

Truth Teller
NYPD needs to Go on strike until Deblasio steps Down

777

Michael Hibbs
They dont like cops? They gonna love the Military. Keep it up!

625

William Hammond
All of NYPD should walk off the job & we will see how long the city is left standing. I will give it 12 hours.

471

Rosa Avila Ryan
Democrats only have victims as followers and as a Hispanic woman I was brainwashed for many years to vote Democrat. I would never vote Democrat again!! While Republicans may not be the answer Democrats are definitely the problem.

Read more

311

Truth Teller
Find each one of these scumbags put them behind bars for Interfering with an Arrest & assault!

304

catpisssniffer69
We are not overall a 3rd world country yet but we have pockets that closely resembles it.

240

Fifi N
This is sad…the other side don’t know what is right and wrong anymore.

124

LiberalWeirdo
I don’t know how any white person can vote democrat at this point. Blows my mind. It’s the party of criminals and blatant racism against whites.

147

Reaper Game over
Wait until New York has that black out they talking about that might happen. Who are they gonna call Ghostbusters LOL

VIDEO: Robert Francis ‘Beto’ O’Rourke Calls Trump Racist, Supporters Nazis, Rally ‘Nuremberg Rally’

Beto Trump Racist Nuremberg Rally

Robert Francis is not a fan of President Trump or his supporters.

By Tom Pappert

In an appearance on ABC’s “The Briefing Room”, Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke called President Donald Trump racist, alluded that his supporters are closeted Nazis, and compared his recent North Carolina rally to the Nuremberg Rallies of Nazi Germany.

While appearing on “The Briefing Room”, O’Rourke condemned President Trump as a racist for the comments the president made about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), who has repeatedly made anti-American and anti-Semitic comments during her brief time in Congress.

“Yes, President Trump is a racist. What we saw in North Carolina last week was almost an impromptu Nuremberg rally,” said O’Rourke. “Inciting hatred, and untimely I think, implicit in that, is violence against people based on the color of their skin, based on their religion, based on their difference from the majority of Americans.”

O’Rourke also doubled down on some of the left’s favorite lies about President Trump, namely, that the president referred to all Mexican immigrants as “rapists and criminals”, when he was referring to a subset of illegal immigrants, that President Trump claims all asylum seekers are lying to gain asylum status, and that President Trump defended the Ku Klux Klan after the 2017 events in Charlottesville, Virginia.

“And it is in keeping with the president who describes Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals, who describes asylum seekers as animals or an infestation, who says that Klansmen are very fine people,” said O’Rourke. “It’s very clear the path that he is taking us on, and we either willingly submit to that, we are complicit in our silence, or we stand up against it.”

O’Rourke also lambasted what he views as silence from members of Congress regarding President Trump’s speech, even though several prominent globalists including Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) publicly denounced President Trump for his speech.

“Silence, especially from members of Congress, who hold a position of public trust and power,” said O’Rourke.

After slamming congressional Republicans, O’Rourke promised retribution for President Trump’s mean words.

“Silence is complicity in what President Trump is doing,” O’Rourke went on. “And there will be accounting, there will be a reckoning, there will be justice for this sooner or later.”

O’Rourke is currently polling at 0.0 per cent in the battleground state of New Hampshire as his campaign fumbles in the darkness.

Big League Politics reported:

The poll of 351 registered New Hampshire voters places O’Rourke at 0 per cent, with precisely zero poll respondents listing his name. Above O’Rourke are Washington Gov. Jay Inslee with a poll frequency of one, sex cult-affiliated Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand with a frequency of four, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard with a frequency of four.

Sen. Cory Booker also has a frequency of four, and is beat by Black Magic Woman Marianne Williamson who has a frequency of five. Sen. Amy Klobuchar almost breaks into double digits, with a frequency of 9.

If you are noticing a pattern, it is that virtually nobody cares for the vast majority of Democrats within the state of New Hampshire.

Perhaps O’Rourke, who lost to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) in the 2018 midterm elections despite nonstop favorable media coverage and support from virtually every Hollywood celebrity of note, believes calling President Trump “a racist” will reignite the embers of his failing campaign.

Hell freezes over? New York Times wants closer relationship with Russia, congratulates Trump

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 11.14.18 AM

The New York Times’ editorial board, fresh from peddling anti-Russia conspiracies for two years, has made a remarkable about-turn. Now the paper wants closer relations with the Kremlin, all to thwart China’s ambitions.

‘Russiagate’ has maintained an iron grip on American political discourse for two years now, even after Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report cleared President Donald Trump of conspiring with the Kremlin to steal the 2016 US election. In the media, the public has been treated to nightly conspiracy theories and bizarre connect-the-dots articles claiming to prove collusion; and lawmakers have crafted ever more draconian sanctions bills against Russia and have slotted opposition to Russia into their campaign messages.

Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing have looked to each other, holding joint military exercises and upping their trade volume to more than $100 billion in 2018. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev recently announced plans to build a new, 2,000km-long highway linking Europe and China, while President Vladimir Putin has been mulling connecting Russia’s Northern Sea Route with China’s Maritime Silk Road, an ambitious global trade route linking China with ports in Southeast Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Middle East.

The idea of closer Moscow/Beijing cooperation clearly worries the New York Times’ editorial board. In an op-edpublished on Sunday, the board wrote that “President Trump is correct to try to establish a sounder relationship with Russia and peel it away from China” – itself a remarkable compliment from a paper that ran op-eds titled “Donald Trump Hates America,” and “Trump is Racist to the Bone” in the last five days.

The board then suggested that the US could strengthen its cooperation with Russia in space exploration and Arctic cleanup – areas untainted by ‘Russiagate’. In addition, new arms control treaties could be a step towards geopolitical cooperation between the two rival superpowers.

All valid and worthy points, but from the New York Times? Yes, we’re talking about the same newspaper that last year called Trump a “treasonous traitor” ahead of his meeting with Putin in Helsinki. Instead of seeking rapprochement then, the paper argued that Trump should “be directing all resources at his disposal to punish Russia.” 

We’re talking about the same New York Times that dubbed Trump “Putin’s Lackey” and released a mocking videodetailing a ‘love story’ between Trump and Putin, laden with homoerotic overtones and culminating in a tongue-locking kiss between the two leaders. It’s funny because they’re gay, see?

The piece surprised many, like pundit George Szamuely, who wrote that Washington has demonized Russia and blamed it for every problem besetting [the] US,” while the Times “has for years berated Trump for advocating this perfectly sensible policy, at times suggesting that he was doing so only because he was Putin’s agent and a traitor to the United States.”

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 11.19.16 AM

Bear in mind that the Times’ editorial board does not hold the same opinions as its revolving cast of op-ed writers. Still, for a newspaper whose writers almost unanimously despise the US president, Sunday’s op-ed represents a shocking repudiation of two years of anti-Russia, anti-Trump static.

Perhaps the outlet that often voiced the ideas of the American establishment has finally realized that the ‘Russiagate’ horse is too long dead for another flogging? Or maybe the Times saw it’s time for a new kind of politics: the politics of Detente. Either way, the change is a surprising one.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑