by Mark Dice – 10/1/2019
By Trent Baker
Schweizer told host Mark Levin that the former vice presidentâs son was being paid by Ukraine despite not having expertise in the energy sector while Joe Biden was the âpoint-personâ on former President Barack Obamaâs administration in dealing with Ukraine.
âThe key question here that nobody seems to want to ask in the media is: What was he being paid for? He wasnât being paid for his expertise. What was he being paid for? And what were the Ukrainians expecting to get in return?â Schweizer stated. âI think when you overlay the financial payments with the fact that Joe Biden as point person on Obama administration policy to Ukraine was steering billions of dollars of Western money to Ukraine it becomes crystal clear exactly why they were paying him money. They wanted access and they wanted to influence Joe Biden. And Joe Biden has been around a long time here, and he had to know exactly why his son was being paid.â
Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent
The conference, aimed at raising awareness about âthe importance of anti-racist action in the UKâ took place at Pleasance Theater, owned by the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, on Saturday.
It was organized by a group tellingly named âThe Resisting Whiteness Collective,â which describes itself as a ânot-for-profit grassroots organization of QTPOC [Queer and Trans People of Color] activists.â While touting the event, the group said that it wants to make it âas accessible as possible and therefore have free tickets available for those who would like to attend.â
However, it seems not everybody was welcome. The rules published on the conferenceâs official website state that if an attendee is white, they will have no right to ask questions, at least publicly. The rule, introduced to âamplify the voices of people of colorâ said that âpriority will be given to questions from people of color in the audience.â
âIf you are a white person in the audience and you still have a question after the panel has ended, please feel free to share your questions with a member of the committee or our speakers thenâÂ
While some argued that the attempt to muffle voices of a particular group, in this case white people, is tantamount to the racism that the “collective” so fervently opposes, another controversial rule sparked comparisons with segregation practices.
The “safe spaces” rule states that one of the two rooms âavailable to anyone who needs to remove themselves from the conferenceâ due to anxiety issues or just to take a break is off-limits to white people.
âThe Braid room is a safe space for only people of color, and the Cheviot room is available for anyone who needs it,â the rule states.
The controversial event was thrust into the national media spotlight earlier this week after outspoken media personality Katie Hopkins denounced the universityâs decision to host the gathering on Twitter.
Her tweet has opened the floodgates to similar accusations against the university, with many arguing that by throwing its weight behind the event, the school is endorsing racism.
âYou’re hosting ‘Resisting Whiteness,’ is that not similar to ‘resisting blackness?'” one commenter asked.
Another Twitter user suggested that the group has âa hidden agenda… [to] stoke race wars.â
Responding to the backlash, the university said that the organizers had agreed to revise the âsafe spacesâ policy to âensure [the] event is compliant with our values.â
They did appear to have watered-down the wording of the mic-access rule that had originally stated: “We will not be giving the microphone to white people during the Q&As.â However, if there were changes to the “safe spaces” rule, they are not reflected on the event’s official webpage.
While many chided the organizers, others sided with the “collective,” arguing that âreverse racismâ does not exist.
A bookshop that helped to arrange the event took a swipe at the critics, saying that they had âwillfully misunderstoodâ the groupâs intentions.
âResisting whiteness is not about white individuals, it is about whiteness as a pervasive system of oppression â both social & political â a system that needs resisting & dismantling,â it wrote.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
The radio host told his vast listening audience that latest impeachment efforts against Trump were just another attempt to overturn the 2016 election results and ânothing more than the Steele dossier 2.0.â
Limbaugh said that the Washington establishment was getting increasingly edgy because Trump threatens to destroy their power base for good.
âTheir careers, their fortunes, their corruption. There are terribly big stakes involved here for these people. And Trump is on the cusp of overturning it and exposing it,â Limbaugh said.
He also noted that the basis for the impeachment inquiry against Trump is just more manufactured opposition research.
âThe media is not media. Itâs just Democrats who work in the media, and the whole group of âem is aligned. And what we are in the middle of now, folks, is a Cold Civil War,â he said.
Last night, President Trump quote tweeted Pastor Robert Jeffress, who told Fox News, âIf the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.â
By Jose Nino
âHouse Democrats just voted to prioritize health care for illegal immigrants over health care for our veterans. What a disgrace!,â he said in a tweet.
U.S. Congressman Mark Walker also condemned this vote on his website.
He stated, âEarlier this week, I said impeachment was the House Democrats only agenda. I was mistaken. They just passed legislation that will give illegal immigrants better health care records than our veterans and servicemembers. More and more they are making their priorities clear and itâs absolutely shameful.â
However, there is a major problem with this bill, which Walker notes:
The problem? The Veterans Administration (VA) will not have similar electronic health records systems in place for nine years and the Department of Defense (DOD) will not have those systems for another five years.
Additionally, the new requirements are not funded, so DHS would be forced to take funds from other agency efforts including border security, combatting terrorism, stopping drug and human trafficking, and natural disaster response.
As the days go by, the present-day Democratic Party continues to show its contempt towards everyday Americans by favoring destabilizing policies like mass migration.
By Jim Hoft
As reported this morning, Adam Schiff leads the House Intelligence Committee and this past week he oversaw the Intel Committee where he attempted to align President Trump with some âtrumpedâ up allegations concerning his phone call with the President of the Ukraine.
Schiff lied in his opening remarks and claimed numerous falsehoods about the Presidentâs call in spite of the transcript being provided the day before.
His entire description of the Presidentâs call was a lie â we have the transcript and this was not in it!
In 2013 Ukrainian Igor Pasternak held two different fund raisers for Schiff asking for contributions between $1,000 and $2,500 â
Pasternack has also been connected to George Soros â
Pasternak is an arms dealer. He has sold arms in places like Syria â
Ukrainian arms dealer Pasternak met Pelosi at the fundraiser Pasternak held in Washington D.C.
Below is Pasternakâs luxurious home in DC where he held fundraisers for the Democrats.
Hat tip Kevin O. and Yaacov Apelbaum
Schiff âtotally made up my conversation with Ukraine President and read it to Congress,â Trump tweeted out on Friday.
He must resign and be investigated. He has been doing this for two years. He is a sick man!
On Thursday, the congressman pretended to read the transcript provided by the White House of Trumpâs conversation with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, only to use his own words and interpretations. When called on it, he claimed it was a âparody.â
The âtwo yearsâ bit was a reference to Schiffâs role in promoting the âRussiagateâ conspiracy theory. From his perch on the Intelligence Committee, the congressman has been a regular fixture on cable channels critical of the president, going so far as to claim he had evidence of Trumpâs âcollusionâ with Russia. Special counsel Robert Mueller found none, however, and Schiff was never called to account for claims to the contrary.
Schiffâs eventual response on Twitter was to say Trumpâs âown words and deeds mock themselvesâ and therefore need no additional mockery. He also claimed, again, that Trump âengaged in a shakedown to get election dirt from a foreign country. And then… tried to cover it up.â
Democrats have cited the Ukraine phone call to launch an impeachment inquiry against Trump.
By Pam Key
Wallace said, âThe spinning that has been done by the presidentâs defenders over the last 24 hours since this very damaging whistleblower complaint came out, the spinning is is not surprising but it is astonishing, and I think deeply misleading.â
He continued, âLetâs look at what the whistleblower says. The whistleblower says it was a troubling call in which the president asked the Ukrainian president to investigate and to look at the allegation of this wrongdoing by Vice President Biden and by his son. We now have a rough transcript of that phone call and thatâs exactly what happened.â
He added, âWhat is clear from reading the complaint that it is a serious allegation, that a lot of it has proven to be borne out already. The whistle-blower lays out a blueprint from talking to various officials in the White House, various officials in the State Department. And to dismiss this as a political hack seems to me to be an effort by the president defenders to try to make nothing out of something and there is something there.â
By Vizarer
9/27/2019
Tom's Blog 