Published on Jul 25, 2019
Trump Administration Rule Proposal Will Cut 3 Million Undeserving People Off Food Stamps

By Jeff Dunetz
The Trump administration is proposing a rule change that would cut up to 3.1 million people from the food stamp program, saving taxpayers $2.5 billion annually.
The revised regulation would require people who currently receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, to undergo a separate income review to determine if they are eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Currently, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) officials say, 43 states automatically allow their reside
âSome states are taking advantage of loopholes that allow people to receive the SNAP benefits who would otherwise not qualify and for which they are not entitled,â Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue revealed in a conference call.

âThis proposal will save money and preserve the integrity of the program,â Perdue argued, adding that âSNAP should be a temporary safety net.â
Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) said the rule change is an attempt by the administration to âcircumvent Congress and make harmful changes to nutrition assistance that have been repeatedly rejected on a bipartisan basis.â
The Trump administration has argued that a booming economy has helped lower the unemployment rate to full employment, making food stamp assistance less necessary.
When Barack Obama entered office in 2009, about 33 million Americans were enrolled in SNAP. By 2013, that number had shot upto 48 million, an indication of his awful economic programs.
On the other hand, because of his successful economic programs , two million Americans dropped from the food stamp program during Trumpâs first year as President, which at that time was the lowest point in eight years.
Transgender Activist Calls For More Domestic Terrorist Attacks & Trump Assassination, Cheers Antifa Firebomber as âHeroâ

A YouTuber is calling for more violence against migrant detention centers in the days after the Antifa fire bomb terroristâs attack.
By Tom Pappert
A transgendered Antifa YouTube content creator who calls herself Christopher Szabo released a video titled âImportant Message To Leftists | In Memory of Will Van Spronsenâ, in which she urged other leftists to enact attacks similar to that of Willem Van Spronsen, who attacked a migrant detention center in Tacoma, Washington with an AR-15 rifle and Molotov cocktails.
Szabo, who announced on Instagram that she is undergoing hormone replacement therapy, gave âtributeâ to Van Spronsen, and stressed that she considers the domestic terrorist who attempted to fire bomb the migrant detention center in Tacoma a âheroâ in her video, before stressing the need for more attacks against the United States government.
âI want to take a moment to give a tribute to Willem Van Spronsen,â said Szabo. âIâm just gonna say it, I think youâre a hero. I donât care what you say, I think theyâre a hero, and if you disagree with me, youâre f**king wrong.â
Szabo continued, âThere are many incidents in history where people have taken radical positions and I have agreed with them, but this is the one time in my life time when I have seen someone take a radical stance where they put their life on the line, they fought for something selfless, and they died for it.â
The video then takes an even darker turn, as Szabo stresses the need for more domestic terrorist attacks.
âItâs something that we, on the left, should resonate with. Not just resonate with, but repeat. Not just repeat, you have to understand, this is just one individual, his death cannot go in vain, we need multiple individuals. We need multiple of these instances to happen.â
âWhat Iâm calling for here, is that this cannot be an isolated incident, where one person storms into an ICE detention center and blows off a car and comes in with an AR-15, you know, and they just die,â said Szabo. âNo, this canât be an isolated incident.â
Szabo went on, âInstead, we need to have not just one time where somebody goes in, but not just two times, we need to have multiple people coming in, multiple people storming them, and we can f**king hang those motherf**kers on a f**king tree for all of the motherf**king country to see.â
She also ordered mass organization, saying that âYou guys need to get organized, like more so than ever before.â
In her YouTube About section, Szabo calls herself âan anarcho-communist content creatorâ who wants to âcombat white supremacy and capitalism.â On Patreon, Szabosays she âis creating funny videos and leftist content.â
She has also threatened President Donald Trump, Paul Joseph Watson, and Steven Crowder on Twitter.


Additionally, Szabo affiliates with various other prominent left wing groups on its Discord channel, with Earth Strike International, an international anti-climate change group, listed prominently as an âallyâ.

Big League Politics has asked YouTube to comment on a video advocating violence being present on its platform, and did not receive a response in time for publication. Likewise, Big League Politics did not receive an immediate response from Twitter regarding threats against President Trump being present on its platform, or whether Twitter also reported these threats to the Secret Service.
Big League Politics intends to provide law enforcement agencies with all relevant information regarding Szaboâs social media use.
Robert Mueller Squirms and Stammers Under Intense Questioning from Matt Gaetz
Gaetz made Mueller squirm while questioning him about Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.
By Shane Trejo
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) blasted former FBI special investigator Robert Mueller during a Congressional hearing today before the House Judiciary Committee regarding Muellerâs unwillingness to address Fusion FPS and their dubious Christopher Steele dossier.
âDirector Mueller, can you state with confidence that the Steele dossier was not part of Russiaâs disinformation campaign?â Gaetz asked Mueller.
âUhh ahh, I said, eeh uhh, in my opening statement, ehh uhh, that, uhh, part of the, ehh uhh, building of the case was predated me by at least ten months,â Mueller responded, struggling to spit out a coherent sentence.
âYeah, and Paul Manafortâs alleged crimes regarding tax evasion predated you, and you had no problem charging him,â Gaetz retorted.
The pro-Trump legislator was just getting warmed up in taking Mueller to task for how he conducted his biased witch hunt.
âAs a matter of fact, this Steele dossier predated the Attorney General, and he didnât have any problem answering the question. When Sen. Cornyn asked the Attorney General the exact question I asked you, Director, the Attorney General said, and Iâm quoting, âNo, I canât state that with confidence, and thatâs one of the areas Iâm reviewing. Iâm concerned about it, and I donât think itâs entirely speculative,’â Gaetz told Mueller.
âNow if something is not entirely speculative, then it must have some factual basis, but you identify no factual basis regarding the dossier or the possibility that it was apart of the Russia disinformation campaign,â he added.
Gaetz then began to delve into the details regarding the Steele dossier, which was produced by Fusion GPS via the law firm Perkins Coie funded with cash from the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Committee.
âSteele reported to the FBI that senior Russian foreign ministry figures, along with other Russians, told him that there was, and Iâm quoting from the Steele dossier, âextensive evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign team and the Kremlin,’â Gaetz said.
âSo hereâs my question, did Russians really tell that to Christopher Steele or did he just make it all up and was he just lying to the FBI?â Gaetz asked Mueller.
Mueller resorted to his usual defense throughout the dayâs questioning, in order to slither out of having to provide a direct answer.
âThatâs beyond my purview,â Mueller responded.
Gaetz was not impressed by Muellerâs weasel tactics, and continued to drill him with the facts.
âNo, it is exactly your purview, Director Mueller, and hereâs why,â Gaetz said. âOnly one of two things is possible, right, either, Steele made this whole thing up, and there were never any Russians telling him of this vast criminal conspiracy that you didnât find, or Russians lied to Steele.â
âNow, if Russians were lying to Steele to undermine our confidence in our duly elected President, that would seem to be precisely your purview because you stated in your opening that the organizing principle was to fully and thoroughly investigate Russiaâs interference, but you werenât interested in whether or not Russians were interfering through Christopher Steele,â he added.
Gaetzâs smack down of Mueller can be viewed in full here:

Muellerâs persistent confusion and inability to answer basic questions has many speculating that he was merely a figurehead, and was never responsible for the contents of his own report.
Jack Posobiec of One America News Network contends that the Mueller report was written by Department of Justice attorney Andrew Weissman, a member of Muellerâs team who has extensive ties to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Today has to be seen as a major victory for Republicans, led by Gaetz, who can now point to Muellerâs muddled testimony as more evidence that his investigation against President Trump regarding Russian collusion was a biased witch hunt.
Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Mueller for dodging questions
Published on July 24, 2019
Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan presses former Special Counsel Robert Mueller on the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation. Jordan says maybe a better course of action is to figure out how the false accusations started.
Rep. Gohmert grills Mueller: Did you know Strzok hated Trump?
Published on July 24, 2019
Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert questions former Special Counsel Robert Mueller on his relationship with James Comey and the people he chose to hire to his team.
Mueller Says It Doesn’t Matter His Lawyers Had Connections To Clinton
Published on July 24, 2019
57
37
136
26
35
24
18
45
GOOGLE ENGINEER WHISTLEBLOWER TELLS PROJECT VERITAS: TECH âDANGEROUS,â âTAKING SIDESâ

âI really donât buy the idea that big tech is politically neutral,â he says
JULY 24, 2019
Senior Google engineer Greg Coppola has revealed to Project Veritas the political bias within Googleâs culture, warning that it has compromised the integrity of its products and search engine.
âIâve been coding since I was ten [years old.] I have a PhD, I have five yearsâ experience at Google and I just know how algorithms are. They donât write themselves. We write them to do what we want them to do,â Coppola said.
âI think for a while we had tech that was politically neutral. Now we have tech that really, first of all is taking sides in a political contest, which I think, you know, anytime you have big corporate power merging with political parties can be dangerous. And I think more generally we have to just decide now that we kind of are seeing tech use its power to manipulate people. Itâs a time to decide, you know, do we run the technology, does the technology run us?â
Coppola went on to say that Google started going political during the rise of Donald Trump in the 2016 election cycle.
âI started in 2014. 2014 was an amazing time to be at Google. We didnât talk about politics. No one talked about politics. You know, it was just a chance to work with the best computer scientists in the world, the best facilities, the best computers and free food. I think as the election started to ramp up, the angle that the Democrats and the media took was that anyone who liked Donald Trump was a racistâŚAnd that got picked up everywhere. I mean, every tech company, everybody in New York, everybody in the field of computer science basically believed that. A small number of people do work on making sure that certain new sites are promoted. And in fact, I think it would only take a couple out of an organization of 100,000, you know, to make sure that the product is a certain wayâŚâ
Watch the entire interview and share this link with everybody you know to expose Googleâs political bias to prevent them from stealing the 2020 election.
89