Robert Mueller Squirms and Stammers Under Intense Questioning from Matt Gaetz

Gaetz made Mueller squirm while questioning him about Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.

By Shane Trejo

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) blasted former FBI special investigator Robert Mueller during a Congressional hearing today before the House Judiciary Committee regarding Mueller’s unwillingness to address Fusion FPS and their dubious Christopher Steele dossier.

“Director Mueller, can you state with confidence that the Steele dossier was not part of Russia’s disinformation campaign?” Gaetz asked Mueller.

“Uhh ahh, I said, eeh uhh, in my opening statement, ehh uhh, that, uhh, part of the, ehh uhh, building of the case was predated me by at least ten months,” Mueller responded, struggling to spit out a coherent sentence.

“Yeah, and Paul Manafort’s alleged crimes regarding tax evasion predated you, and you had no problem charging him,” Gaetz retorted.

The pro-Trump legislator was just getting warmed up in taking Mueller to task for how he conducted his biased witch hunt.

“As a matter of fact, this Steele dossier predated the Attorney General, and he didn’t have any problem answering the question. When Sen. Cornyn asked the Attorney General the exact question I asked you, Director, the Attorney General said, and I’m quoting, ‘No, I can’t state that with confidence, and that’s one of the areas I’m reviewing. I’m concerned about it, and I don’t think it’s entirely speculative,’” Gaetz told Mueller.

“Now if something is not entirely speculative, then it must have some factual basis, but you identify no factual basis regarding the dossier or the possibility that it was apart of the Russia disinformation campaign,” he added.

Gaetz then began to delve into the details regarding the Steele dossier, which was produced by Fusion GPS via the law firm Perkins Coie funded with cash from the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Committee.

“Steele reported to the FBI that senior Russian foreign ministry figures, along with other Russians, told him that there was, and I’m quoting from the Steele dossier, ‘extensive evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign team and the Kremlin,’” Gaetz said.

“So here’s my question, did Russians really tell that to Christopher Steele or did he just make it all up and was he just lying to the FBI?” Gaetz asked Mueller.

Mueller resorted to his usual defense throughout the day’s questioning, in order to slither out of having to provide a direct answer.

“That’s beyond my purview,” Mueller responded.

Gaetz was not impressed by Mueller’s weasel tactics, and continued to drill him with the facts.

“No, it is exactly your purview, Director Mueller, and here’s why,” Gaetz said. “Only one of two things is possible, right, either, Steele made this whole thing up, and there were never any Russians telling him of this vast criminal conspiracy that you didn’t find, or Russians lied to Steele.”

“Now, if Russians were lying to Steele to undermine our confidence in our duly elected President, that would seem to be precisely your purview because you stated in your opening that the organizing principle was to fully and thoroughly investigate Russia’s interference, but you weren’t interested in whether or not Russians were interfering through Christopher Steele,” he added.

Gaetz’s smack down of Mueller can be viewed in full here:

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 3.22.26 PM

Mueller’s persistent confusion and inability to answer basic questions has many speculating that he was merely a figurehead, and was never responsible for the contents of his own report.

Jack Posobiec of One America News Network contends that the Mueller report was written by Department of Justice attorney Andrew Weissman, a member of Mueller’s team who has extensive ties to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 3.23.49 PM

Today has to be seen as a major victory for Republicans, led by Gaetz, who can now point to Mueller’s muddled testimony as more evidence that his investigation against President Trump regarding Russian collusion was a biased witch hunt.

Mueller Says It Doesn’t Matter His Lawyers Had Connections To Clinton

Published on July 24, 2019

Marcus McCurley
‘Is your full name Robert Mueller’ “‘I can’t go into that’

89

Mike Delmore
Can we get Weissman to answer questions, seems like he would know more.

57

Joaquin Canals
“I don’t want to go into that” Oh, really?!

37

JC N
“Is your name Robert Mueller?” “I don’t wanna go into that”

136

BigMac 3008
It’s like he hasn’t answered a single question

26

Ryan Flint
3:52 Gordon Ramsey is looking rough!😂

35

Apparatchic
Incredible to watch a reputation being dismantled in real-time…

24

Witty Name
They were hired to “do the job” to convince the world what supposedly Trump did is what Hillary actually did.

18

art american
This whole thing was said, by Dems, to clear up the Muller report for comman people .. I gave up counting how many times he said ” I am not going to answer that”. Thanx for the transparency…

45

Tyrone Murray
Muller – i have been in this business for 25 years. And there my friend is the problem Mr Muller is a swamp dweller!

2015 RASHIDA TLAIB ON DONALD TRUMP AFTER TRAVEL BAN ROLLOUT: ‘DEPORT THIS ASSHOLE!’

2015 Rashida Tlaib on Donald Trump After Travel Ban Rollout: ‘Deport This Asshole!’

Trump, like Tlaib, is an American citizen, so deporting either would not be possible

Breitbart – JULY 24, 2019

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), in 2015, called for the deportation of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

In response to Trump rolling out his travel ban idea in December 2015, a version of which he would later successfully implement as president despite legal challenges, Tlaib said on Twitter: “Deport this asshole!”

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 11.10.43 AM

Trump, like Tlaib, is an American citizen, so deporting either would not be possible. But this tweet carries particular irony now, given Trump’s comments about Tlaib and her fellow members of the so-called “Squad”Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA)–in recent weeks, where President Trump has said in tweets of his own that they should go back to where they came from if they do not like America.

The tweets from Trump–and his doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on them–set off a firestorm in official Washington, with the Democrat-led House of Representatives last week pushing through a resolution condemning Trump as a “racist” in response to them.

Read more

…’NOT FAMILIAR’ WITH FUSION GPS?… ‘CAN’T GET INTO’ PROF WHO SPIED ON PAPADOPOULOS, LIED TO FBI…Robert Mueller Testifies on Trump-Russia Report Findings

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 29: Special Counsel Robert Mueller makes a statement about the Russia investigation on May 29, 2019 at the Justice Department in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

By Joshua Caplan

Former special counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday is testifying before Congressional lawmakers regarding his investigation into now-debunked criminal conspiracy between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia. Mueller will testify publicly at 8:30 a.m. EST before the House Judiciary Committee and at noon EST before the House Intelligence Committee.

Mueller has said that he will not stray beyond what’s already been revealed in his 448-page  report. The Justice Department has instructed Mueller to stay strictly within those parameters, giving him a formal directive to point to if he faces questions he does not want to answer.

On Tuesday, Democrats on the House judiciary and intelligence panels granted his request to have his top aide in the investigation, Aaron Zebley, sit at the table with him. Zebley is not expected to be sworn in for questioning by the judiciary panel.

President Trump slammed the hearings ahead of Mueller’s testimony, writing on social media that “Democrats and others” are attempting to fabricate a crime and blame it on “a very innocent President.”

“Why didn’t Robert Mueller investigate the investigators?” the president tweeted.

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.35.14 AM

Wednesday’s first hearing before the House Judiciary Committee will focus on whether the president illegally obstructed justice by attempting to seize control of Mueller’s investigation. Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney and General Rod Rosenstein, citing the special counsel’s findings, ruled the president did not commit obstruction of justice during the two-year-long investigation that cost taxpayers over $25 million.

The afternoon hearing before the House intelligence committee will dive into purported ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

Many House Democrats hope Mueller’s testimony will re-energize efforts to impeach the president, though some political observers believe that is unlikely to occur. Today’s hearings come one week after the House voted 332-95 to table a resolution calling for impeachment brought by Rep. Al Green. (D-TX).

**Follow all of the events on the Breitbart News Live Wire below. All times in eastern.**

11:24 AM — Drudge Report founder Matt Drudge tweets:

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.37.05 AM

11:23 AM — Exchange between Rep. Lou Correa (D-CA) and Robert Mueller regarding former NSA advisor Michael Flynn:

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.38.18 AM

11:20 AM — Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) to Robert Mueller: “Did other witnesses lie to you?”

Robert Mueller replies“I think there are probably a spectrum of witnesses in terms of those who are not telling the full truth or those who are outright liars.”

11:19 AM — Rep. Guy Reschenthaler R-PA rips Robert Mueller:

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.40.02 AM

11:13 AM —

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.41.04 AM

11:11 AM — 2020 White House hopeful and South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg comments on Mueller’s testimony:

11:10 AM —
Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.42.28 AM

11:08 AM —  Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ) asks Robert Mueller: “Were you ever fired as special counsel?” 

Robert Mueller replies “No” and later says he was allowed to complete his probe unencumbered.

11:00 AM — Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) asks Robert Mueller: “You found evidence that the president engaged in efforts to encourage witnesses not to cooperate with the investigation.” 

Robert Mueller replies: “That’s correct.”

10:59 AM —

10:54 AM — Rep. Tom McClintock (D-CA) says Robert Mueller dropped a  “paper sack” on “fire” at Congress’s doorstep with his report.

Robert Mueller replies: “I don’t think you’ll review a report that is as thorough, as fair, as consistent.”

10:52 AM — Fail by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA):

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.44.11 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.44.58 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.45.53 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.46.35 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.47.33 AM

10:19 AM —

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.48.53 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.49.37 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.50.40 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.51.33 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.52.21 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.53.33 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.54.22 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.55.25 AM

9:18 AM — More between Robert Mueller and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX). 

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.56.55 AM.png

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.57.40 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.58.38 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.59.12 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 10.59.56 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 11.00.55 AM

Screen Shot 2019-07-24 at 11.01.43 AM

DEEP FAKE? INTERNET CLAIMS RBG DIDN’T ACTUALLY ATTEND SCOTUS FUNERAL

Deep Fake? Internet Claims RBG Didn't Actually Attend SCOTUS Funeral

Technology’s high level of sophistication making people question everything

JULY 23, 2019

Internet users are claiming a video showing Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg attending the funeral of late Justice John Paul Stevens is a deep fake.

After RBG was MIA for several months due to surgery, the web went wild with rumors the SCOTUS elder could be terminal or worse.

Now, even C-SPAN footage of one of Ginsburg’s rare public appearances is being scrutinized.

Check out the video below:

While many are claiming the video showing a rather decrepit Ginsburg near the casket is a deep fake due to people passing in front of Justice John Roberts, the video appears to be authentic and not a re-edit according to our analysis.

With deep fakes becoming more realistic and sophisticated by the day, it’s no wonder people are questioning their own eyes, but we predict this is merely one of many deep fake controversies to come.

Hell freezes over? New York Times wants closer relationship with Russia, congratulates Trump

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 11.14.18 AM

The New York Times’ editorial board, fresh from peddling anti-Russia conspiracies for two years, has made a remarkable about-turn. Now the paper wants closer relations with the Kremlin, all to thwart China’s ambitions.

‘Russiagate’ has maintained an iron grip on American political discourse for two years now, even after Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report cleared President Donald Trump of conspiring with the Kremlin to steal the 2016 US election. In the media, the public has been treated to nightly conspiracy theories and bizarre connect-the-dots articles claiming to prove collusion; and lawmakers have crafted ever more draconian sanctions bills against Russia and have slotted opposition to Russia into their campaign messages.

Meanwhile, Moscow and Beijing have looked to each other, holding joint military exercises and upping their trade volume to more than $100 billion in 2018. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev recently announced plans to build a new, 2,000km-long highway linking Europe and China, while President Vladimir Putin has been mulling connecting Russia’s Northern Sea Route with China’s Maritime Silk Road, an ambitious global trade route linking China with ports in Southeast Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Middle East.

The idea of closer Moscow/Beijing cooperation clearly worries the New York Times’ editorial board. In an op-edpublished on Sunday, the board wrote that “President Trump is correct to try to establish a sounder relationship with Russia and peel it away from China” – itself a remarkable compliment from a paper that ran op-eds titled “Donald Trump Hates America,” and “Trump is Racist to the Bone” in the last five days.

The board then suggested that the US could strengthen its cooperation with Russia in space exploration and Arctic cleanup – areas untainted by ‘Russiagate’. In addition, new arms control treaties could be a step towards geopolitical cooperation between the two rival superpowers.

All valid and worthy points, but from the New York Times? Yes, we’re talking about the same newspaper that last year called Trump a “treasonous traitor” ahead of his meeting with Putin in Helsinki. Instead of seeking rapprochement then, the paper argued that Trump should “be directing all resources at his disposal to punish Russia.” 

We’re talking about the same New York Times that dubbed Trump “Putin’s Lackey” and released a mocking videodetailing a ‘love story’ between Trump and Putin, laden with homoerotic overtones and culminating in a tongue-locking kiss between the two leaders. It’s funny because they’re gay, see?

The piece surprised many, like pundit George Szamuely, who wrote that Washington has demonized Russia and blamed it for every problem besetting [the] US,” while the Times “has for years berated Trump for advocating this perfectly sensible policy, at times suggesting that he was doing so only because he was Putin’s agent and a traitor to the United States.”

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 11.19.16 AM

Bear in mind that the Times’ editorial board does not hold the same opinions as its revolving cast of op-ed writers. Still, for a newspaper whose writers almost unanimously despise the US president, Sunday’s op-ed represents a shocking repudiation of two years of anti-Russia, anti-Trump static.

Perhaps the outlet that often voiced the ideas of the American establishment has finally realized that the ‘Russiagate’ horse is too long dead for another flogging? Or maybe the Times saw it’s time for a new kind of politics: the politics of Detente. Either way, the change is a surprising one.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑