INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST: BILL CLINTON IS LYING ABOUT FLYING ON ‘LOLITA EXPRESS’ ONLY 4 TIMES

Investigative Journalist: Bill Clinton is Lying About Flying on 'Lolita Express' Only 4 Times

“Almost every time that Clinton’s name is on the pilot logs there are underage girls”

JULY 9, 2019

An investigative journalist and human trafficking expert says that Bill Clinton is lying when he claims he only flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ four times.

Conchita Sarnoff spent over a decade looking into documents and interviewing officials and witnesses surrounding the Epstein case.

During an appearance on Fox News last night, she confounded former president Clinton’s attempt to distance himself from Epstein.

Clinton released a statement claiming he had not spoken to Epstein in over a decade and that he only took four trips on Epstein’s airplane.

Flight logs obtained by Fox News in 2016 show that Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet at least 26 times, trips that included, “extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names.”

“I have read too much information and I have spoken to too many people on the inside,” said Sarnoff, adding that she attempted to interview Clinton but he refused.

“I know from the pilot logs, these were logs written by different pilots at different times, that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein’s 27 times,” Sarnoff said, adding that sometimes Clinton ditched his Secret Service detail for these flights.

“Almost every time that Clinton’s name is on the pilot logs there are underage girls, there are initials and there are names of many many girls on that private plane,” said the journalist.

“Why would anyone, not only a former president, fly on a plane 27 times that did not belong to him?” asked Sarnoff.

When Clinton’s statement was read out to her, Sarnoff asserted that Clinton “is not telling the truth,” highlighting how Epstein was one of the original funders of the Clinton Global Initiative and gave him $4 million dollars.

As we reported earlier, conservative commentator Ann Coulter asserts that Epstein was the front man for a “state sponsored” network that used the underage girls as a means of blackmailing powerful men.

Ilhan Omar Admits She ‘May Have Flubbed Some Facts’ In Dramatic Story She Told High School Students

By Joseph Curl

Rep. Ilhan Omar told a tale of woe five years ago when she was a Minneapolis council member.

Appearing at Richfield High School, she claimed she once witnessed an example of pure injustice that spurred her in her quest for political power.

She told hundreds of students there that she remembered a “sweet, old… African-American lady” who ended up in jail for an entire weekend for stealing a $2 loaf of bread to feed her “starving 5-year-old granddaughter,” according to the Washington Post.

See the source image

After spending the weekend in jail, the woman was led into the courtroom and fined $80 — a penalty she couldn’t pay. “I couldn’t control my emotions,” Omar continued, “because I couldn’t understand how a roomful of educated adults could do something so unjust.”

“Bulls—!” she recalled yelling in the courtroom.

Laughter rippled through the auditorium, then silence.

Then The Post dropped the hammer. “Omar’s story echoed the plot of ‘Les Miserables.’ If true, it is also probably embellished. City officials said that police aren’t allowed to arrest people for shoplifting unless there’s a likelihood of violence or further crime. Typically, shoplifters are sentenced to attend a three-hour class.”

Oof.

The Post asked her about the incident — in an otherwise glowing piece on the newly elect member of Congress — and then wrote that she “may have flubbed some facts.”

In an interview, Omar said she may have flubbed some facts. “She might have had a prior [arrest],” Omar said. “I’m not sure. . . . The details might not have all matched, but that’s what I remember.”

The Post also pointed out another instance in which, as they said, Omar “flubbed some facts.” In a speech to a veterans group, the Minnesota Democrat claimed nearly half of all military families “rely on food stamps.”

See the source image

 

 

Tucker Investigates: How did Chris Cuomo get into Yale?

Shaina Short
Why exactly do private ivy leagues get tax dollars!??? Serious question.

324

View 14 replies
Angela Villalobos
These elite colleges have no appeal anymore. I dont equate them with smart people.

248

View 9 replies
david rees
1 Rule for Our Masters and many other Rules for Us the Serfs ….

101

View reply
Beijing yank
I’ve met a few people from Stanford…all filthy rich. “Kid you don’t do your homework. You cheat on exams. You game all day. How do you expect to get into college?” The teacher inquires. “Back door.” Comes the response from the Mayor’s son.

120

Bev Taylor
And Chelsea spent her Stanford years traveling around the world with her mother. She is so brilliant that she doesn’t t even need to attend classes! Amazing…

119

View 5 replies
Johnny4aces
This is not White privilege, this is Elite privilege. Witness, the Obamas, and the Al Shady Sharptons of our society. The Elites, i.e., the ruling class, sure know how to take care of their own.

122

View 7 replies
Jenna Caruthers
“Connected” is the only qualification for anything these days. I’ve done research work with alumni of many stripes and the number one reason to go to college is to meet an upperclassperson who can offer you a job when you get out.

31

Thanos The God
27 seconds in and giving this a like. LOL Hilarious.

47

Alex Huxley
George Carlin said it best: “it’s a big club — and you ain’t in it”

13

View reply
Dale Nelson
Liberal Democrats are the most hypocritical creatures on earth.

Social justice snowflakes won’t quit until US becomes a balkanized battlefield (or is it already?)

CAP

By Robert Bridge

America’s ‘progressive’ lunatic fringe is in a heated contest with itself to see who can make the most outrageous claims of victim-hood and oppression. Such a deranged pastime can only lead to national ruin.

In the latest episode of stupid Liberal stunts, we pay a visit to the Starbucks in Tempe, Arizona, where a disgruntled individual reportedly felt uneasy about a heavy police presence inside the coffee shop. Was this anxious person a criminal, perchance, annoyed that his plans for daylight robbery were dashed by Tempe’s finest? Nope. Perhaps he was an escapee from the local penitentiary who’d just had the misfortune of being in the wrong place at the wrong time? Wrong again.

Arizona cops spark #dumpstarbucks campaign after officers asked to leave store

CAP

According to the Tempe Officers Association, six members of the local police force were standing together “having a cup of coffee before their long 4th of July shift” when they were approached by a barista, who informed the officers that an ordinary customer “did not feel safe” because of their presence.

The barista then requested – with the sweetest smile money can buy, no doubt – that the cops “move out of the customer’s line of sight or leave.” The compliant officers, probably too stunned to formulate a better response, obeyed the request and hastily beat a retreat out the door.

CAP

This brief exchange proves the all-American maxim, which says ‘the customer is always right,’ has been taken to a whole new level of madness. Worse, it demonstrates how easily offended Americans – indoctrinated as they are on a regular basis with political correctness and social justice ideology – have become over the most trivial matters.

What should have occurred – and in fact would have occurred about a decade earlier – is that the Starbucks employee, taken aback by such a strange complaint (on the Fourth of July, no less!) would have consulted with his or her manager on the matter. Then, in all likelihood, the manager would have calmly explained to the distressed customer that the police officers were regular patrons and had every right to be inside the shop, too. Far more likely, however, is that nobody would have thought to express discomfort about police officers inside of a coffee shop just a few short years ago. But these are brave new days in the United States.

It should come as no surprise that the Starbucks employee was only too happy to indulge the complaining customer. The barista, however, should not be judged too harshly. After all, playing the victim card has become institutionalized to such a degree in the US that even city councils and corporations appear helpless before its powerful influence.

Just this month, for example, former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick complained to Nike, the sports shoe maker, that “he and others” found their latest line of footwear, which carried the Betsy Ross-era flag of a younger United States, “offensive.” Why? Because the 13-star flag, representing the colonies that fought successfully against British rule, made its inaugural appearance when slavery was still part of the young nation’s experience.

How did the Fortune 500 company respond to the complaint by Kaepernick, whose claim to fame to date has been to ‘take a knee’ during the opening national anthem before NFL games to protest police brutality? Nike responded much like the Starbucks barista did when confronted by the “annoyed” customer: it immediately acquiesced to the request, pulling the line of trainers from production, even though the claim that the flag is associated with ‘white supremacist’ groups is a gross exaggeration: it even featured prominently at Barack Obama’s 2013 presidential inauguration.

CAP

Meanwhile, in yet another blow this month to diehard American traditions and institutions, very non-politically correct MAD magazine fell heavier into the dust than a bronze Civil War-era statue. The 67-year old satire publication, which encouraged several generations of Americans to take a cynical, distrustful attitude towards politics, as well as other features of modern society, was destined to fall in these very unfunny times. After all, with every fiber in the liberal body acting as antennae to hunt down the slightest offense, even ironic ones, the death and demise of a magazine that preyed on moronic behavior with scathing wit never stood a chance.

CAP

Earlier in July, the wise city fathers of Charlottesville, Virginia, said they will no longer celebrate Thomas Jefferson’s birthday as an official city holiday, opting instead for a day devoted to the emancipation of African-American slaves. Jefferson was both a slave-holding president as well as a Founding Father who wrote the original draft of the Declaration of Independence.

America’s homegrown Taliban, which consider themselves to be ‘progressive,’ are actively destroying statues, publications, flags, symbols and even intellectual debate on college campuses. This unprecedented phenomenon has spawned a dangerous mindset in Americans that supports the idea that any person who feels uncomfortable with some aspect of society – even if it happened hundreds of years ago – should be coddled like a child and given exactly what they want.

America takes great pride in being a nation of vast cultural diversity – possibly the most diverse collection of people ever assembled under one roof. Yet, at the same time, it has declared open season on tolerance and difference of opinion. Even history itself has been declared an enemy. This is an impossible and even dangerous venture. Today, no idea, no historic artifact, no symbol that attracts uncomfortable associations for some minority group of people is deemed permissible. What is quickly happening, therefore, is that a large segment of the US population has declared war on American history, which is filled – as is the history of every nation – with stories of triumph mixed with tragedy.

However, to think that by destroying historical statues and forbidding the expression of certain words and emblems will somehow correct past wrongs is a very dangerous misconception. In fact, what this ‘killing of history’ will ultimately do is guarantee that the American people will be doomed to repeat terrible chapters of their violent past.

It’s time to stop coddling the complainers and leave the historical markers alone. If we’re going to continue to be a nation of many different colors and creeds, then we need to bravely and honestly accept our history, warts and all. It is really the only way forward.

UK tabloids theorize Russia hacked ambassador’s Trump memos… as London eggs them on

Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 11.11.21 AM

London has said there is no evidence that a foreign state was behind the recent leaks from its embassy in Washington, but this hasn’t stopped British officials from quietly feeding tabloid narratives blaming Russia for the affair.

The UK government is in full damage-control mode after a series of memos penned by the UK ambassador to Washington, Sir Kim Darroch, were leaked to the press. The diplomatic cables described US President Donald Trump as “incompetent.”

While British officials appear to believe that the embarrassing leaks were carried out by an “unpatriotic” insider, Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt didn’t seem to mind playing along with tabloid speculation that Russia is somehow at fault.

Pressed by the Sun about whether he believed “hostile states such as Russia” may be behind the leaks, Hunt was all too happy to quietly fan the flames – even while acknowledging that there was no reason to suspect that Russia or any other country played a part in the incident.

“Of course it would be massively concerning if it was the act of a foreign, hostile state,” he said, adding that investigators would follow all avenues of inquiry to try to understand how this happened. That’s something that will be considered.”

Despite his apparent hand-wringing, Hunt conceded that he’s “seen no evidence” to suggest that any foreign country was involved in the affair.

The Daily Mail was a bit more creative with its Russia-baiting. In a write-up of Hunt’s comments to the Sun, the British tabloid claimed that it had spoken with a “government source” who “thought [the leak] looked like something ‘out of Russia’s playbook.’”

Russia has become the West’s go-to scapegoat, with media outlets accusing Moscow of a litany of devious misdeeds, from hacking elections to training Beluga whales to spy on Scandinavia.

The threat posed by Russia may be a tad overstated, however. An alert system created by the EU to detect “Russian meddling,” for example, has yet to sound an alarm in the six months of its existence.

 

Climate Change Crusader Tom Steyer Enters 2020 Presidential Race

DES MOINES, IA - JANUARY 09: Billionaire Activist Tom Steyer speaks to supporters on January 9, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. Steyer announced that he would not run for president in 2020, and would instead concentrate his efforts on the possibility of impeaching President Trump. (Photo by Steve Pope/Getty Images)

By Joshua Caplan

Billionaire Democrat donor and climate change crusader Tom Steyer entered the 2020 presidential race on Tuesday.

Steyer, 62, is one of the most visible and deep-pocketed liberals advocating for President Donald Trump’s impeachment. He surprised many Democrats in January when he traveled to Iowa, home to the nation’s first presidential caucus, to declare that he would focus entirely on the impeachment effort instead of seeking the White House.

Despite becoming a national voice on the impeachment issue, Steyer made no mention of it in his campaign announcement. Instead, he said his campaign will focus on reducing the influence of corporations in politics. He also plans to target climate change, which is the focus of the Steyer-backed advocacy group NextGen America.

“Americans are deeply disappointed and hurt by the way they’re treated by what they see as the power elite in Washington, D.C., and that goes across party lines and it goes across democracy,” Steyer said in a video his campaign was releasing Tuesday. “We’ve got to take the corporate control out of our politics.”

Steyer will step down from NextGen America and Need to Impeach.

Last week, Steyer held a conference call with supporters, telling them he planned to launch a bid for the White House, according to Politico.

“He’s definitely focused on the [fact that the] economy is not as good as people are making it out to be,” an anonymous source told the news outlet.

The Associated Press contributed to his report.

Buying Ice Cream In The New America

By Chris Menahan

Remember how you used to be able to go to the store and buy ice cream without having to go to the cash register, show photo ID to an employee and ask permission from police?

Those days are done.

A photo shared online over the weekend shows an ice cream freezer locked up with a sign reading, “Please see employee for help.”

Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 10.36.07 AM

The Keller Police Department in Texas shared a photo on Friday showing two armed police officers protecting a store’s ice cream freezer.

Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 10.37.06 AM

In the New America, Americans can no longer be trusted to not open ice cream buckets (and other consumer goods) and lick them before putting them back on the shelves.

Embedded video

Tunde, MPAS, PA-C@GatorPA_

That Blue Bell ice cream girl has started something. 🤦🏾‍♂️

9,407 people are talking about this

Soon we’ll have to show ID and go through checkpoints just to enter a store.

This is what “progress” looks like!

Tucker: The Democratic Party is now a religious cult

PUBLISHED ON JULY 8, 2019

Big Swin76
Women of color are so oppressed in this country, says a woman who’s religion oppresses millions of women all over the world. 🤨🤨

821

View 50 replies
Florentina Weber
There you go , they are eating each other in their own party ….. isn’t that beautiful???? Good , the other party is busy running a country .

436

View 15 replies
Ken Robison
They wanna overthrow a duly elected president because of their political and criminal crimes. Mr. President drain that swamp!

60

View 5 replies
AP B
“The goal of Socialism is Communism.” Vladimir Lenin

334

View 14 replies
Gene Set
I wish they would put this much energy into stopping human trafficking. It’s happening everyday.

75

View 3 replies
Nimisha Acharya
Asylum for Tommy Robinson. The UK is persecuting innocent citizens. OUTRAGEOUS

34

View 3 replies
Bonnie Nix
Talib and her fellow justice Democrats idiots should be ran out of Congress. We need people in our government that love America and the freedoms and opportunity patriots love🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏

37

View 2 replies
randalthor13
Blah Blah Blah, People of coulour. So it is now all about skin colour and not merit or knowledge. What a joke America has become.

75

View 6 replies
Jennifer Christensen
These leftist lunatics have played the ‘racist’ card for too long, that now it has no meaning whatsoever. In fact they bring out the race card only because they have no real grievance to air. You are right to call it a cult. Because like all cults they rely on violence and threats to impose their will on others.

America First Candidate Joey Saladino SLIMED by GOP Establishment

By Jose Nino

On July 5, 2019, the campaign of Joseph “Joey” Saladino accused a Manhattan GOP Political Director, Robert “Bob” Morgan Jr. of sexual harassment.

According to a press release from Saladino’s team, this campaign of sexual harassment took place on Independence Day.  Robert “Bob” Morgan Jr is a well-established figured in the New York Republican Party machine with strong ties to Saladino’s establishment opponent, Nicole Malliotakis.

As millions of Americans put partisanship and petty politics aside during the 4thof July, Morgan spread nude photos of Saladino on Twitter. Based on an interview with Saladino, these photos were originally from one of Saladino’s previous YouTube endeavors where he was pulling Jackass style stunts. Morgan took it a step further by trying to shame Saladino for his pictures.

In light of these attacks, Saladino commented, “Of course, I’m angry to suffer this kind of sexual harassment from an official of the Manhattan GOP.”

Trending: Epstein Dined With George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric After First Release From Jail

The congressional candidate added, “First of all, it was on Independence Day he decided to do this, and two it’s really creepy that he would be so interested in my body and my [genitalia].”

Morgan made no efforts of trying to hide the images behind adult content filters, which made them freely available for minors to view. Saladino claims “It’s guaranteed that he exposed the images to minors, he made no efforts to censor the images.”

The Saladino campaign believes “that this targeted, politically motivated sexual harassment campaign was directed by members of Nicole Malliotakis’ assembly or campaign staff.” In Saladino’s view, Robert Morgan lacks the guile or initiative to carry out such an attack on his own.

In fact, Saladino revealed to Big League Politics that he had a previous run-in with Morgan’s business partner, Liam McCabe, during a Trump watch party event in June. As Saladino tried to peacefully enter the venue, he was met by McCabe, who threatened to have Saladino removed from the venue for no reason. McCabe yelled repeatedly at Saladino, “You can’t be here!”

Saladino’s campaign staff was as able to de-escalate the situation and enter the venue without problems. But that was not the end of this encounter. On Independence Day, Morgan took to the Internet and started launching coordinated attacks Saladino.

Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 10.13.59 AM

Saladino’s campaign staff was as able to de-escalate the situation and enter the venue without problems. But that was not the end of this encounter. On Independence Day, Morgan took to the Internet and started launching coordinated attacks Saladino.

The Saladino campaign condemns this behavior and vows to “pursue all legal means to prevent this from occurring for other candidates regardless of political affiliation.”

Screen Shot 2019-07-09 at 10.16.17 AM

BLP reported on Saladino becoming the first American YouTuber to enter the political arena as a congressional candidate.

Saladino has positioned himself as the pro-small business and pro-worker candidate for New York’s 11th district.

On top of that, Saladino has called for a more rational approach to mass migration, an issue that has galvanized nationalist movements worldwide due to its negative social and economic effects.

With what’s at stake in the 2020 elections, New York needs a strong alternative to the political status quo. Not politics as usual.

Saladino’s campaign offers a new approach to New York politics. That’s why Malliotakis and company are engaging in extracurricular smears against Saladino. They know their ideas don’t hold weight against Saladino’s robust America First platform.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑